Two sides of the global-warming debate
June 13th, 2008 at 10:25am Pat Cunningham
This is kind of fun, if you have a while to plow through these arguments.
First, we have THIS SPEECH by John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel and a leading global-warming denier.
Then we have THIS STUFF from climate scientist Gavin Schmidt. (Granted, a lot of the material at this site is complicated scientific data, and there are more than 400 comments attached. But even a layman can derive some useful impressions if you go through it all.)
Entry Filed under: global warming
3 Comments Add your own
1. Optimistic1 | June 13th, 2008 at 10:58 am
Have to give quick kudos to Applesauce for posting a couple credible sources to look at and not asking me to trust Al Gore or Hollywood. Give me the science from people who will not profit from the outcome and I bet some honest debate and even some solutions (If possible) may lie in our future.
2. equalityrkfd= | June 13th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
I thought Global warming would be much more fun and not as expensive!
3. Menlo Bob | June 13th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Which one takes note of no temperature change in the last 8 years?
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed