They have nothing to do with rock concerts or phony patriotism. They have everything to do with what Obama really stands for, and it sure as hell ain’t “Change We Can Believe In”

Obama said:

“My country must stand with yours and with Europe in sending a direct message to Iran that it must abandon its nuclear ambitions.”

But he said absolutely nothing about the nuclear weapons that Israel has developed and has threatened to use. Nor does he say anything at all about the illegal settlements that Israel continues to build and expand in violation of international law. Why should there be one legal standard for Iran and quite another for the Zionist entity?

Obama said:

“Will we stand for the human rights of the dissident in Burma, the blogger in Iran, or the voter in Zimbabwe? Will we give meaning to the words “never again” in Darfur?”

But he does not even mention the horrific violations of basic human rights that are happening this very minute in China. Is Obama unaware of Communist China’s relentless persecution of Tibetans, Uighurs, Falun Gong practitioners, Christians, and democracy activists, or just indifferent to it?

Obama is just another lying lowdown lawyer whore parasite who has, for his whole life, gone along in order to get along. If Obama really stood for real Change, he would not even be close to being the Democratic Party nominee.

Rather, Obama has shown himself, time and again, to be an eloquent front man for the Corporate Mafia’s greed, and for Zionist racism, and for an economic and political system that exploits and feeds off the unjustified suffering of innocents all over the world.

So, the next time you hear Obama spewing forth his soaring rhetoric, look more closely at what he says and doesn’t say. That’s where you’ll find who this man really is and what he truly stands for.

Lawyers are liars!
Lawyers are whores!
Obama is one of the best,
Oh my!

OK. I’ll buy that. Thanks.

My chiming in had to do with Pat protesting his Barack crush, which just about any reasonable person can see is going strong.

“The conventional wisdom on certain subjects is so deeply rooted that no amount of evidence disturbs its hold. That’s how it is with those dreary predictions that young Americans just won’t vote.

“Since the late 1960s, the same chorus has been heard from election to election: The young don’t care. They’re disengaged. They’re too wrapped up in their music, their favorite sports and their parties to take an interest in politics. Predicting that the young will vote in large numbers is like saying the Cubs will finally win the World Series.

“As it happens, the Cubs are doing well this season, and the evidence is overwhelming that this year the young really will vote in large numbers — and they just might tip the election.

“The trend started four years ago. According to the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement, or Circle, electoral participation among 18- to 24-year-olds increased from 36 percent in 2000 to 47 percent in 2004. For the larger 18-to-29 group, participation rose from 40 to 49 percent.

“The 2006 midterm elections brought a greater increase in off-year voting among the under-30s than in any other age group.”