|

Only “wussy” Republicans back the stimulus bill?

As most of us know, your typical Republican male lives in mortal fear of being perceived as anything less than macho (hence, the rabid homophobia among GOPers).

But here’s a new twist on that theme. GOP strategist Alex Castellanos, brimming with testosterone, tells us that any Republican who votes for the stimulus bill is “wussy”:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e68KEt_6X34&eurl=http://www.americablog.com/[/youtube]

Share:

5 Comments

  1. Optimistic1

    Keep on talking about Limbaugh and Repubs Pat, it may give you ample time to avoid the fact that many of the appointments Obama has made don’t pay their taxes or have criminal charges on the way like Richardson. I believe Nancy Pelosi called it the “Culture of Corruption” a few years back, and she sure made it sound like a one way Republican Street. Where is the ever exciting “Change” most of your emotion filled side voted for from the Movie Star Obama? The Dems are in complete control, why all this needing republican votes crap if the Dems have the magic plan to fix all the failed Repub Policies?

    How about Kevorkian’s, oh wait, Pelosi’s plan to kill off babies to stimulate the economy? Haven’t heard much on that either from this Blog.

  2. Orlando Clay

    This morning’s headlines tout that Obama’s stimulus package is on track for passage by the Senate, most likely on Monday.

    So, after the first inning, it looks as though the score is: President Obama and the American People 1, Rush Limbaugh and GOP Obstructionists 0.

    Face reality, Cons: We’re going to fix your 8 years of failed ideology and get this country back on track, as the U2 anthem goes, with or without you.

  3. Optimistic1 writes: “The Dems are in complete control, why all this needing republican votes crap…” So, now we can add Senate filibusters to the list of stuff about which Optimistic1 knows nothing. The list is getting very long.

  4. No to “stimulus” bill. Here’s why:
    Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited ‘after-the-fact’ short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addressed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment ‘citizen’ is not sufficient. A ‘President’ MUST BE an Article 2 ‘natural born citizen’ AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.

  5. Ah, it must be computer night at the loony bin, and Ted is spending his Saturday evening pretending to know things he doesn’t know. That’s all right, Ted. Have fun. Some of our regular visitors are just as bonkers as you. For all I know, some of them might be inmates of your institution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA

*