Red State Update on the tea parties
April 17th, 2009 at 08:32am Pat Cunningham
The last few seconds of this dialogue are the best:
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized
Applesauce
Pat Cunningham offers an unabashedly liberal perspective on national politics. A note of caution: The language gets a litttle salty on some of the sites to which this blog links. So, don’t say you weren’t warned. By the way, this blog’s name is inspired by the Will Rogers quote, “All politics is applesauce.” |
 |
April 17th, 2009 at 08:32am Pat Cunningham
The last few seconds of this dialogue are the best:
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
4 Comments Add your own
1. snuss | April 18th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Hey, Pat, are you proud of this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms45EzMR0f8
2. Pat Cunningham | April 18th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
snuss: “Proud” is not the word we’re looking for here. The woman’s not my daughter or my sister or anyone else in whom I’m going to take “pride.” No, I’m not “proud” of this. Nor do I agree with most of what she says. See, I’m very forthright about that — unlike you, who, just a week or so ago, refused to take issue with that creepy caller on C-SPAN who referred to Obama by race. You called my objections to this guy’s language mere “whining about minutae” and “racial nit-picking.” You’re a beauty, snuss. Racism seems never to offend you. When it arises, you always try to change the subject or make excuses for it. In that video to which you linked above, Janine Garofalo was unfair in suggesting that all the tea-partiers were were white racists. Not all, or even most, Obamaphobes are white racists. But all white racists are Obamaphobes. And they seem never to offend you.
3. snuss | April 18th, 2009 at 9:05 pm
Pat sez: “unlike you, who, just a week or so ago, refused to take issue with that creepy caller on C-SPAN who referred to Obama by race.”
Pat, quit your inane whining. The guy called Obama a BLACK MAN. Last I heard, that IS what he is portrayed as. I would think it is a greater insult to be called a Socialist, than being called black, white, brown, red, or yellow. Unless, of course, you ARE a Socialist.
If that caller had been using racial epithets, I would agree that it was totally wrong. But, elevating such a trivial comment to the status of a racial hate crime is nothing more than the usual blatant Leftist race-baiting.
And, speaking of race-baiting…….
Pat sez: “Obamaphobes are white racists” Really? What do you call non-whites, who don’t like Obama? What about the blacks who don’t like Obama? Are they also racists? There are PLENTY of things about which to dislike Obama, that have NOTHING to do with his melatonin levels.
So, Pat, your premise is nothing more than another pathetic Liberal race-baiting attempt, to avoid the REAL issues, as to why Obama is intensely disliked by many of us..
4. Pat Cunningham | April 19th, 2009 at 10:28 am
snuss misquotes me with this: “Pat sez: ‘Obamaphobes are white racists.’”
What I actually said was this: “Not all, or even most, Obamaphobes are white racists.”
snuss is dishonest. Hence, there’s no point in me responding to any future comments he makes on this blog.
So, go ahead, snuss. You’re free to peddle any lies you want without correction from me (unless, of course, you libel somebody or violate our rules of decency, in which case you’ll be banned forever).
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed