So how come we don’t have any wacko militia groups in these parts? Or do we?
November 16th, 2009 at 12:18pm Pat Cunningham
 Whenever I read of deliciously loony political uprisings in other parts of the country — book-burnings, anti-evolution campaigns against public schools, organized counterattacks in the so-called War on Christmas, the rise of vigililante groups, etc. — I usually rue the fact that we almost never get that kind of fun stuff here in Applesauceland.
 Rockford used to a pretty nutty town. There was a time when chapters of the John Birch Society bloomed hereabouts like so many flowers in spring. Campaigns against water flouridation as a communist plot abounded. Subversion of one kind or another was suspected at every turn. The city was known far and wide as a citadel of right-wing extremism. We even had anti-integration campaigns when there weren’t enough black kids to fill more than a relative handful of seats in the public schools.
 But we don’t get much of that crazy stuff anymore. Oh, sure, the comment threads here at Applesauce are often filled with the rantings of paranoiacs and latter-day brownshirts, but these folks are disorganized wannabes. Theirs isn’t a movement so much as a would-be chorus in which nobody can sing on key.
 This absence of far-right political theater in these parts struck me again today when I read THIS STORY about how scores of new militia groups have formed across the country since the election of Barack Obama as president.
Of course, militia groups tend to thrive when there’s any Democrat in the White House, but apparently more so when the man in the Oval Office represents the dreaded Other. And Obama’s the whole package of Other. He’s not only black, but, to hear some people tell it, he’s also a foreign-born Muslim who hates America and hangs around with domestic terrorists like Bill Ayers.
 Yeah, we have our share of Obamaphobes around here. But where’s our home-grown militia? Where are our guys who dress up in camouflage outfits and pretend to be Rambos who are prepared to smite the internal enemy at the first sound of the bugle call?
 Either we don’t have such brave specimens among our menfolk, or they’re so cleverly secretive that they’ve formed a vast underground network of well-organized superpatriots without my having noticed.
 No, no! I shouldn’t think such thoughts. That will only scare me, and that’s exactly what the militia guys want. Yes, I must remain vigilant — but never fearful.
 On the other hand, they probably know that I’m not armed. Jeez, what should I do? No wonder some of my Applesauce commenters have asked where I reside. They’re after me, I tell you. They think that I, too, am the Other.
Entry Filed under: militia groups


5 Comments Add your own
1. Mike Carroll | November 16th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
“…or they’re so cleverly secretive that they’ve formed a vast underground network of well-organized superpatriots without my having noticed.”
One of my favorite sayings Pat-You are not truly paranoid if people really are out to get you. Sleep well tonight.
2. Pat Cunningham | November 16th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Mike Carroll: I’m going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you recognize my pseudo-paranoia as a mockery of the people at whom this post is aimed. But I’ll bet the farm that some of our resident nitwits won’t get it.
Well, the joke’s on them. I said I’m unarmed, but I’m not. I’ve got more firearms than Charlton Heston left in his will.
AK-47s? Those are for punks. I’ve got the AK-48, which, as the number implies, is much better.
Glock? Glock schmock! I’ve got the Grandfather Glock, which automatically fires at the top of every hour at anybody standing in my front hall.
Armor-piercing bullets? Piffle! My bullets, if fired into the ground, will pierce anything in their way and come out on the other side of the Earth. I got a complaint the other day from some guy in Asia.
Yeah, I’m the baddest, manliest gun nut that ever was. I’m a one-man militia. Only weenies need to run in groups.
3. Mike Carroll | November 16th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
A bit off point perhaps but I have never felt a need to own a gun. I have no problem with people who do but just not my thing.
I had some plumbing work done at my house recently by a person who does own quite a few guns (he hunts and shoots trap) and he said that Obama is the greatest gun and ammo salesman since Smith and Wesson. From what he told me there are types of ammunition you just can’t get without waiting for months. I guess Obama’s election has “stimulated” at least one sector of the economy.
4. Pat Cunningham | November 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
Mike: The sector to which you refer is the nut sector. My favorite variety of that species is the guy who thinks his little cache of weapons might someday be used to ward off an oppressive government. That’s more than paranoia. That’s a complete divorce from reality.
5. Juice | November 16th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Pat, for a Conservative or Constitutionalist , owning a gun is not considered nutty. It’s part of history and a Constitution right.. I guess you could compare it to an earring collection for a Liberal man. Very personal and not to be made fun of.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed