There’s enough stuff here to start a whole bunch of raging arguments


You’re going to love THIS STUFF — refutations of conservative myths about the Tea Party movement, taxes, illegal immigration, ObamaCare, traditional marriage, federal budget deficits, Social Security and global cooling.

If this doesn’t fill the comments queue to record levels, I’ll be mighty surprised, ladies and gentlemen.



  1. Neftali

    Guess I’ll go first…..

    Social Security IS in fact going broke. They cite the freakazoids at moveon.org to backup their point. Of course, that’s just ignorant liberal lies.

    Here’s the truth, right from SSA itself on their report released on April 5th

    Under the long-range intermediate assumptions, annual cost for the OASDI program is projected to exceed tax income in 2010 and 2011, to be less than tax income in 2012 through 2014, then to exceed tax income in 2015 and remain higher throughout the remainder of the long-range period. The combined OASI and DI Trust Funds are projected to increase in dollar level through 2024, and then to decline and become exhausted and thus unable to pay scheduled benefits in full on a timely basis in 2037. However, the DI Trust Fund is projected to become exhausted in 2018, so some action will be needed in the next few years. At a minimum, a reallocation of the payroll tax rate between OASI and DI would be necessary, as was done in 1994.

    Note: The whole thing is 243 pages of accounting nightmares, but you just need to read the conclusion on page 3 of the report, or page 11 of the pdf file.

  2. Neftali

    oops…I meant August 5th….not sure why I typed April….

  3. Neftali: Lame stuff.

    I defy you to specifically refute the points made by the “freakazoids at move.on,” as you call them.

    Your argument above does no such thing.

    Maybe you should read the piece by this freakazoid:


  4. The problem with Pat is that he is an old dog who will not learn any new tricks. He resorts to the same race-baiting, name calling and belittling of those who disagree with his liberal viewpoints and very rarely engages in actual discussion of a topic or acknowledges that there may be more than one legitimate way to view an issue.

    Tiresome and depressing. At times it’s like watching a car wreck. Somebody please help me look away 😉

  5. Jim: I may not be important, but my grammar is better than yours.

    Not filling up very “quick”?

    Where did you go to school, Jim?

    Y’know, if you study hard, you might be able to get a GED (Good Enough Diploma).

  6. Jim: My mother is deceased, and I’ll tolerate no more remarks about her from you.

    You’ll apologize for that, or you’ll be gone. Nobody here would miss you anyway. You never have anything to offer except stupid expressions like “manly-man” and other such crap.

  7. dogrescuer

    Pat: When the haters can\’t come up with a logical rebuttal to your column, and they seldom can, they’ll always attack you personally. I suppose you’ve gotten used to it!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *