|

There’s a big difference between climate skeptics and climate cranks

 Mark Heertsgaard explains the fundamental difference scientific climate skeptics and political climate cranks.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaKQCY5ybMY&feature=player_embedded#at=550[/youtube]

Share:

2 Comments

  1. Mark Thomas

    First was “global warming”.

    Then when there was no explanation to the record cold temps throughout the world so it was changed to “climate change”.

    When I was growing up we called it “weather”.

    We won’t go into all of these so called “scientific” documents that were faked.

  2. Mark Thomas: Wow, you’re really out to make a fool of yourself today.

    On another thread earlier this afternoon, you peddled some nonsense about how strong union states “typically vote for Democrats,” a claim I have since categorically refuted.

    And now you’re writing about “so called ‘scientific’ documents that were faked.”

    You’re probably referring to the so-called Climategate scandal. Well, you must be new here, because that crap has been debunked over and over and over again. Only the most dimwitted flat-earthers are still buying that nonsense.

    Here’s my latest post on the Climategate “scandal”:

    http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2011/02/24/scientists-exonerated-in-climategate-probe-requested-by-james-inhofe-notorious-global-warming-skeptic/

    If you want to try dispute the investigations that are referenced in the piece to which I linked in that recent post, feel free. I would welcome the opportunity to mock you again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>