This guys says the media won’t admit the election already is over and Obama has won

Matt Taibbi, one of the more colorful and talented of our political writers these days, ARGUES that all the media reports about a close presidential race this year are just a lot of hooey:

The apathy factor in American presidential politics has seemingly never been higher.

As if to combat this, we’re getting stories now about how this election is closer than you’d think, how Obama is in for a “tight race” or a “fierce fight” with Romney, and how the Republican challenger is “closing in” to a “statistical dead heat.”

They’re going to say this, and they may even have numbers to back it up, like this week’s Gallup poll showing Obama with just a two-point lead. But I think it’s a mirage.

The people who work for the wire services and the news networks are physically incapable of writing sentences like, “This election is even more over than the Knicks-Heat series.” They are required, if not by law then by neurological reflex, to describe every presidential campaign as “fierce” and “drawn-out” and “hotly-contested.”

But this campaign, relatively speaking, will not be fierce or hotly contested. Instead it’ll be disappointing, embarrassing, and over very quickly… And everybody knows it. It’s just impossible to take Mitt Romney seriously as a presidential candidate. Even the news reporters who are paid to drum up dramatic undertones are having a hard time selling Romney as half of a titanic title bout…

The Republican base is angrier and more determined than it ever has been, yet Republican voters picked as their nominee the one candidate in their slate of primary challengers who depresses them. This is exactly the John Kerry scenario. Kerry was never going to win, either, and everyone pretty much knew that, too. But at least in the Kerry-Bush race there was a tremendous national debate over the Iraq war, which many people (incorrectly, probably) thought might end more quickly if a Democrat was elected.

This year, it’s not like that. Obviously Republican voters do hate Obama and genuinely believe he’s created a brutally repressive socialist paradigm with his health care law, among other things. But Romney was a pioneer of health care laws, and there will be dampened enthusiasm on the Republican side for putting him in office.


1 Comment

  1. expdoc

    This guy says the Democrats are too complacent and better not believe that they have already won.


    On Wednesday’s broadcast of CNN’s “John King USA,” former Clinton adviser and CNN contributor James Carville doubled down on criticism of Democrats who think that they will cruise to victory against former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in November.

    He said he does not think President Barack Obama has it “in the bag,” despite the feelings of some commentators. (RELATED: Full coverage of the 2012 elections)

    “No, I don’t,” Carville said. “Who in this world would be an incumbent — not just in the United States — an incumbent would feel any sense of confidence whatsoever? And Republicans are raising, as I pointed out, hundreds of millions of dollars. These super PACs — money is pouring into them and Democrats are saying, ‘We’re going to win this thing,’ and it just doesn’t make any sense.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *