|

Here’s more criticism of Romney by conservatives concerning the 47-percent gaffe

Yesterday, we told you HERE about Bill Kristol of the conservative Weekly Standard characterizing Mitt Romney’s infamous remarks at a fundraiser as “stupid and arrogant.”

Today, we have THIS PIECE from conservative pundit Peggy Noonan of The Wall Street Journal:

What should Mitt Romney do now? He should peer deep into the abyss. He should look straight into the heart of darkness where lies a Republican defeat in a year the Republican presidential candidate almost couldn’t lose. He should imagine what it will mean for the country, for a great political philosophy, conservatism, for his party and, last, for himself. He must look down unblinkingly.

And then he needs to snap out of it, and move.

He has got seven weeks. He’s just had two big flubs. On the Mideast he seemed like a political opportunist, not big and wise but small and tinny. It mattered because the crisis was one of those moments when people look at you and imagine you as president.

Then his comments released last night and made months ago at the private fundraiser in Boca Raton, Fla.

(Snip)

This is not how big leaders talk, it’s how shallow campaign operatives talk: They slice and dice the electorate like that, they see everything as determined by this interest or that. They’re usually young enough and dumb enough that nobody holds it against them, but they don’t know anything. They don’t know much about America.

We are a big, complicated nation. And we are human beings. We are people. We have souls. We are complex. We are not data points. Many things go into our decisions and our political affiliations.

You have to be sophisticated to know that. And if you’re operating at the top of national politics, you’re supposed to be sophisticated.

(Snip)

You know what Romney sounded like? Like a kid new to politics who thinks he got the inside lowdown on how it works from some operative. But those old operatives, they never know how it works. They knew how it worked for one cycle back in the day.

HERE‘s what Linda McMahon, a Republican candidate for the Senate said:

I disagree with Governor Romney’s insinuation that 47% of Americans believe they are victims who must depend on the government for their care. I know that the vast majority of those who rely on government are not in that situation because they want to be. People today are struggling because the government has failed to keep America competitive, failed to support job creators, and failed to get our economy back on track.

I am sympathetic to the struggles that millions of Americans are going through because I’ve been there.

David Frum, a former speechwriter for George W. Bush, says THIS:

More than one-fifth of Romney’s moocher 47% are elderly: people who pay no income taxes because their income takes the form of Social Security – many of those people are Republican voters (even if they don’t understand “dependency” to apply to them)…

[M]ore than 60% of the 47% pay payroll taxes. At 15.3%, the payroll tax rate represents a higher rate of tax than that paid by Mitt Romney himself.

Only about one-fifth of taxpayers are non-elderly people who pay no tax at all, and they are paying no tax mostly because they are unemployed in the worst economic crisis since the 1930s, a crisis that candidate Romney blames on the president and promises to correct. It seems a hard saying to call these promised beneficiaries of a Romney recovery people who don’t take responsibility for their lives.

HERE‘s David Brooks, a resident conservative columnist on the op-ed pages of The New York Times:

The people who receive the disproportionate share of government spending are not big-government lovers. They are Republicans. They are senior citizens. They are white men with high school degrees. As Bill Galston of the Brookings Institution has noted, the people who have benefited from the entitlements explosion are middle-class workers, more so than the dependent poor.

 

Share:

5 Comments

  1. Luke Fredrickson

    The most offensive comment I heard in Romney’s video is when he whines about Obama:

    “The thing which I find most disappointing about this President: his attack on one American against another American—his division of America based on going after those who have been successful.”

    Wait a second buddy! YOU are the one who so boastfully dismissed HALF of the nation! Who is a divider? Who is pitting “one American against another American”? You just told us you only represent the concerns of the upper class!

    Romney has made it patently obvious: Class warfare is not Obama’s creation – it has been going on for several decades, with the rich pummeling the lower half of the wage scale. The video is just unvarnished intel on their next battle plan.

  2. The flub flam man strikes again and again and again.

  3. Even after Luke Fredrickson’s amusing little rant, he’s still going to receive a 20% tax cut from Romney after he wins.

  4. Luke Fredrickson

    More likely Rmoney will make me pay more by including my health plan as taxable income and removing my deduction for mortgage interest.

    I would certainly like to know for sure, but this lying schemer won’t tell America the specifics of his tax plan.

    What I do know for certain is Obama has reduced my taxes, and yours.

  5. Mitt has now conclusively proven that even a complete moron can become very wealthy in the USA.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>