|

George McGovern, a bleeding-heart liberal and proud of it, dies at age 90

Any mention of George McGovern in recent years has evoked for me vivid memories of the pathetic spectacle that was the Democratic National Convention of 1972 in Miami Beach, which I covered as a 29-year-old reporter.

It’s a wonder that I can remember anything of that strange week. It was all so contentious and exhausting. Every session lasted through the night, ending only when the sun came up over the Atlantic Ocean. The assembled Democrats fought among themselves over everything, and the discord was such that McGovern’s speech accepting his party’s presidential nomination didn’t begin until 2:48 a.m., long after most of the TV audience across the country had gone to bed. That factor, among others, convinced me even then that this man’s quest for the Oval Office was doomed.

But for me and no doubt lots of other people, the futility of McGovern’s presidential candidacy has never diminished his stature as a thoroughly decent and highly principled man.

Born the son of a Methodist minister in a small town in South Dakota, George McGovern would go on to become a star student in college, a genuine hero as a bomber pilot in World War II, a professor of history and political science, and a builder of the Democratic Party in his home state, which elected him to the U.S. House and then the U.S. Senate.

McGovern was perhaps the first member of the Senate to speak out against America’s increasing military involvement in Vietnam, and he persisted in that dissent through the duration of the conflict.

After his presidential candidacy failed in 1972, McGovern served another eight years in the Senate, but lost a re-election bid in 1980. Thereafter, he spent much of his time writing and lecturing and serving worthy causes, including a stint as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Agencies for Food and Agriculture.

Perhaps the most fitting epitaph for George McGovern was something he wrote himself not so long ago:

During my years in Congress and for the four decades since, I’ve been labeled a “bleeding-heart liberal.” It was not meant as a compliment, but I gladly accept it. My heart does sometimes bleed for those who are hurting in my own country and abroad. A bleeding-heart liberal, by definition, is someone who shows enormous sympathy towards others, especially the least fortunate. Well, we ought to be stirred, even to tears, by society’s ills. And sympathy is the first step toward action. Empathy is born out of the old biblical injunction “Love the neighbor as thyself.”

Share:

2 Comments

  1. “Well, we ought to be stirred, even to tears, by society’s ills. And sympathy is the first step toward action. Empathy is born out of the old biblical injunction “Love the neighbor as thyself.””

    I couldn’t agree more. The problem is that liberals believe the answer is more and bigger government and attempt to equalize outcomes with government intervention. A solution that ultimately will never work.

    I would rather favor smaller, less intrusive government that insures equality of opportunity. When your neighbor needs a hand you need to give it yourself, rather than rely on government to do it for you.

  2. I remember George McGovern, too. One of his campaign promises was to terminate U.S. involvement in Vietnam and to bring all U.S. troops home within a few months. As a draft-age young man in 1972, I found that promise quite mesmerizing.

    But McGovern stumbled badly just like most liberals do.

    I was recently in a large zoo which had young animals that had been rescued from the wild. There were huge signs warning visitors not to feed these animals, because the animals would assume that free junk food would simply rain down on them forever, and they would not learn to hunt or forage in the wild as adults so they could care for themselves.

    This is rather analogous to today’s welfare state. Not perfectly analogous, and I am not calling welfare recipients animals, but the principle is comparable. The government’s role is to make sure that the playing field is level, not that all teams always end up with the same low score. When the government starts giving trillions of dollars to young, able-bodied people who do nothing to earn it, guess what? They learn to sit back and like it, and they construct ludicrous social theories that they are owed this money because our society is irreversibly unjust.

    McGovern and his bloody-hearted liberal pals enabled and energized this nonsense. For this and other reasons, he lost in a landslide in 1972. The incumbent, Nixon, carried 49 states that year. Just like 2016 will be with Mitt Romney and Andrew Cuomo.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>