|

We can curb gun violence by ending the War on Drugs

Michelle Chen NAILS IT:

[A] key aspect of the gun-control debate remains hiding in plain sight. There’s a major driver of gun violence in the U.S. that is neither the bloodlust of the “criminally insane” nor the weakness of public security forces. Failed gun policy is a manifestation of another, arguably more expansive, irrational policy regime: the War on Drugs.  While the most spectacular incidents of mass murder spark public panic, a more relevant, yet typically ignored, source of gun violence lies in the brutality born of the gun industry’s marriage to drug prohibition policies.

For decades, the federal government has sought to eradicate drugs despite the utter futility of the effort and the devastating social, health and economic consequences of its tactics. While Sandy Hook triggered a national convulsion of disgust, the everyday casualties of the drug war have been met with relative silence. With annual gun homicidesnationwide hovering around 10,000, a significant portion can be directly or indirectly linked to drug violence, though estimates for the death toll vary widely.(A recent CDC study of gang homicides, for example, notes that over 90 percent involve guns and the portion in different cities that were drug-related ranged from under five to about 25 percent.) Other analyses of national and international datalikewise suggest a range of proportions depending on how drug-related killing is defined. Whatever the exact figure, the bottom line is that the drug war’s institutionalized violence and oppression, fueled by “tough on crime”law enforcement, inflicts deep, needless social trauma on vulnerable communities. Underpinning that climate of violence are broader societal factors that also tend to be ignored in gun debates, including class and racial polarization.

Such tragedies seem worlds away from Newtown’s massacre–perhaps because we’ve been sensitized over the years to accept the drug prohibition as a social imperative. In reality, the nation’s enormously costly and destructive drug war greases the mechanics of our “culture” of gun violence, as much of the institutionalized violence is bound up with a policy regime that causes systematic harm in the name of public “safety.”

Historical data reveals that today’s politicians refuse to face. In his recent summary of criminological and sociological researchon long-term homicide rates, Yale legal scholar Dan Kahan found that U.S. homicide trends were directly tied both to alcohol prohibition in the 1920s and to the modern prohibition of drugs like marijuana and cocaine.

Share:

4 Comments

  1. We could really curb violence if we gave free drugs to anyone who wants them.

    Maybe we could call it Soma?

  2. Decriminalizing drugs has many societal benefits. Gun violence is one of them. Disproportional incarceration of minorities is most assuredly a result of this “war”. Keeping male minorities out of prison would tremendously benefit their families. It would also eliminate the need for the billions of dollars wasted every year in fighting this war.

  3. The problem with making marijuana legal is what do we do with all the police and prison guards that will no longer be needed? These powerful unions won’t go down without a fight.

  4. They can guard all of the people that will soon be owners of illegal guns.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>