Yet again, we have good cause to offer a grammar lesson to our Republican friends

Former House Majority Leader and erstwhile Tea Party maven Dick Armey (above) was interviewed on the telly the other day and repeatedly misused the noun “Democrat” as an adjective.

It behooves me, then, to trot out my oft-used grammar lesson on this matter, lest admirers of Mr. Armey make even bigger fools of themselves than they already are.

Here goes:

The name of the oldest political party in America is the Democratic Party of the United States. It’s members are known as “Democrats” (a noun).

Grammatically proper references to the party, its plans, its proposals, etc., require the use of the adjective “Democratic,” not the noun “Democrat.”

There is no such thing as “the Democrat Party,” or “Democrat leadership,” or “Democrat agenda” or any other construction in which “Democrat” is used to modify a word or phrase. In such cases, the correct usage is “Democratic.”

Right-wingers, however, seem to think that “Democrat” as an adjective somehow sounds less euphonious, less respectable and  more pejorative than “Democratic.” So, grammatical considerations notwithstanding, they misuse the one word and shun the other. And when they hear any fellow rightist use these words correctly, it grates on them.

The genesis of this Democrat-as-an-adjective silliness is not entirely clear. According to one theory, it all started with Sen. Joseph McCarthy, the infamous red-baiter and witch-hunter of the mid-20th century. Others say it can be traced to the late 1950s when a man named Meade Alcorn, chairman of the Republican National Committee, issued a directive to his minions to thereafter avoid use of the word “Democratic.”

McCarthy’s example or Alcorn’s admonition, whichever it was, has been heeded to this day among the party’s more zealous elements. And woe to he or she who dares stray from this orthodoxy.

Jay Nordlinger, senior editor of the conservative National Review, has written of the guff he gets from some readers for his refusal to misuse “Democrat.” And right-wing writer John L. Perry has conspicuously refused to go along with those who “abuse consciously or misuse ignorantly” the D-word.

The late Sen. Sam Ervin once said: “I have been trying to reform Republicans all my life and have had virtually no success, but I would like for them to adopt good grammar and quit using the noun ‘Democrat’ in lieu of the adjective ‘Democratic.’ If I can teach the Republicans that much grammar, I will feel that my effort to educate them has not been entirely in vain.”



  1. jjgettys

    Yet again, we… Who are the “we” you are referring to, your imaginary readers? This article is a waste of space.

  2. ChattyCathy

    jjgettys: I happen to enjoy Mr. Cunningham’s posts, including this post. Many think Ted Biondo’s posts are a waste of space and a conflict of interest.

  3. JRM_CommonSense

    Pat, If I were to guess the childish reason for this use of the word from another blogger and his lapdogs on this site, they are trying to emphacize that the last 3 letters spell “rat”. They seem to think that it is clever to do this. It is about as clever as calling the President “the Messiah” or B. Hussain Obama.

  4. Milton Waddams

    B. Hussein Obama…that’s the favorite quasi-insult of Mr. Stuart Nuss of Durand, a grumpy 60 year old with a too tight tinfoil hat.

  5. Milton: SNuss was banished from this blog years ago, but he occasionally submits comments that don’t get past the moderation filter.

    Amazingly, lots of other banishees regularly submit comments. Their stuff never gets published here, but that doesn’t stop them from trying.


  6. Milton Waddams

    Good old Stu posts his breathless drivel all over the rest of the rrstar site, so we still get more than our fill of his worldnet daily cut and paste jobs and silly youtube links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *