|

Oops! Her argument against raising the minimum wage misses the mark by several dollars

Poor Marsha Blackburn! She must have missed school the day that inflation was explained.

Blackburn, a Republican member of Congress from Tennessee, says raising the minimum wage from the current $7.25 an hour to $9 would deprive some teenagers of learning the valuable lessons she learned as a kid when she made only $2.15 an hour working in a store.

But she forgot to take inflation into account, as we see HERE:

[W]hat Blackburn didn’t realize is that she accidentally undermined her own argument, since the value of the dollar has changed immensely since her teenage years. Blackburn was born in 1952, so she likely took that retail job at some point between 1968 and 1970. And according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ inflation calculator, the $2.15 an hour Blackburn made then is worth somewhere between $12.72 and $14.18 an hour in today’s dollars, depending on which year she started.

At that time, the minimum wage was $1.60, equivalent to $10.56 in today’s terms. Today’s minimum wage is equivalent to just $1.10 an hour in 1968 dollars, meaning the teenage Blackburn managed to enter the workforce making almost double the wage she now says is keeping teenagers out of the workforce.

Share:

6 Comments

  1. She learned how to figure using the Jethro Bodine mathematical concepts.

  2. I am glad to see that she supports raising the minimum wage to something between $12 and $14 dollars an hour, quite progressive for a republican.

  3. Why don’t we just determine an acceptable minimum wage right now and inflation-adjust yearly.

    That seems like it would work perfectly.

  4. “At that time, the minimum wage was $1.60, equivalent to $10.56 in today’s terms. Today’s minimum wage is equivalent to just $1.10 an hour in 1968 dollars, meaning the teenage Blackburn managed to enter the workforce making almost double the wage she now says is keeping teenagers out of the workforce.”

    I guess this explains it all! Wages go up and everything else follows, so now the left sees how this works. So again if the bottom rate goes up so does everything else and we return to the problem.

    It’s a viscous endless cycle guys!

  5. I’ve given up on arguing with the hopeless wingnut Big Dave, but I can’t resist taking note of his misuse of the word “viscous” in his latest comment.

    “Viscous” is an adjective that means “having a thick, sticky consistency between solid and liquid.”

  6. OMG! A spelling mistake and that’s what Pat comments on but nothing else!

    Because he cannot disprove anything, that’s why!

    But then I think everyone got the point, don’t you Pat.

    It is a vicious cycle when dealing with Pat!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>