Some Republicans, especially in the South, have crazy notions about the U.S. Constitution


I like to think of North Carolina as fairly progressive, especially for a Southern state.

After all, Barack Obama carried the Tarheel state in the 2008 presidential election and only narrowly lost it last year.

But then, from time to time, I’m reminded that North Carolina still has a few states’ rights loonies in public office, as we see HERE:

The Constitution “does not grant the federal government and does not grant the federal courts the power to determine what is or is not constitutional” according to a resolution sponsored by North Carolina House Majority Leader Edgar Starnes and and ten of his fellow Republicans — a statement that puts them at odds with over 200 years of constitutional law. In light of this novel reading of the Constitution, Starnes and his allies also claim that North Carolina is free to ignore the Constitution’s ban on government endorsement of religion:

SECTION 1. The North Carolina General Assembly asserts that the Constitution of the United States of America does not prohibit states or their subsidiaries from making laws respecting an establishment of religion.

SECTION 2. The North Carolina General Assembly does not recognize federal court rulings which prohibit and otherwise regulate the State of North Carolina, its public schools, or any political subdivisions of the State from making laws respecting an establishment of religion.

This resolution is nothing less than an effort to repudiate the result of the Civil War. As the resolution correctly notes, the First Amendment merely provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” and, indeed, the Bill of Rights was originally understood to only place limits on the federal government. For the earliest years of the Republic, the Bill of Rights were not really “rights” at all, but were instead guidelines on which powers belonged to central authorities and which ones remained exclusively in the hands of state lawmakers.

In 1868, however the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified for the express purpose of changing this balance of power. While the early Constitution envisioned “rights” as little more than a battle between central and local government, the Fourteenth Amendment ushered in a more modern understanding. Under this amendment, “[n]o State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States,” nor may any state “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Fourteenth Amendment completely transformed the nature of the American Republic, from one where liberties were generally protected — if at all — by tensions between competing governments to one which recognized that there are certain liberties that cannot be abridged by any government.


1 Comment

  1. Robert

    What does the constitution say about state religions (nothing and the separation church/state clause isn’t there either) but a state religion will imply that the correct religion needs to be professed to hold public office. We all know this is a way once again for the for the far right to make 2nd and 3rd class, anybody who doesn’t believe like they do and to maintain the supremacy they believe Christianity has over all over belief systems. Then will we have to decide what form of Christianity is the state religion? I could see that debate dividing us even more than we are today.

    Heck, growing up Catholic, I/we secretly believed we were Gods favorite people. When I got older, I found out that all my friends who were from different religions, thought the same thing about their faiths. Back then though, we didn’t talk about our religious affiliations as openly and use faith as way to beat people up, as has been done since Reagan courted the far right into the Republican Party.

    I was trying to decide what thread to post this response in. The one about crazy notions Republicans have about the constitution or the one wacky theories embraced by millions of Americans. I chose this one, but it could have been placed in both.


    ” …no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
    Article VI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *