Posted by Pat Cunningham on Apr 5, 2013 in Uncategorized | 6 comments
James West of The Nation created the chart.
I eagerly await responses from readers who get their insights on climate science from the likes of Rush Limbaugh.
The real debate now, is how bad is it going to get….and, what can we do within reason, so that the harm will not outweigh the good that it produces?
Everybody needs to be on board with dealing with now….not later, now..!!
we still have time to make the right changes but we really need to hurry, also we should be out front on the new technologys grabbing the new job markets that will follow.
Put down the Kool-Aid and step away from the MSNBC.
Brian says, “…we should be out front on the new technologys grabbing the new job markets that will follow.”
Sorry, doc, but Brian, while a little bit optimistic, is 100% correct. If we’re going to save our climate, we should be leading the pack and reaping the benefits. Let the other countries, e.g., China, buy their equipment from us.
Exactly Craig, The amount of potential jobs for these new tecnologys is off the charts. Can you imagain what the Chinese would pay to have that orange air the breath scrubed and cleaned by some new invention that doe’s that….most of you say why…and i say why not
It’s obvious as hell that global warming is not a serious problem:
You cannot seriously believe AGW is an important issue, otherwise
you wouldn’t be wasting energy turning on your computer to make
unpersuasive personal attacks on those who argue for the liberty of
allowing people to decide for themselves how much to spend on energy,
and how to allocate those expenditures . IF CAGW were a legitimate concern, would believers be burning CO2 by
flying to conferences in Kyoto, Copenhagen, and Rio? If human produced
CO2 is such a serious threat, wouldn’t it make more sense to
have “teleconferences” instead of meeting in person? Shouldn’t CAGWers
who actually believe in the seriousness of the situation be setting an
example on drastically cutting back energy use?
Everyone,, even religious fundamentalists who believe the world is
only 6000 years old, interacts with and observes other humans. We all
become aware of con artists who trry to get us to donate to
questionable charities, try to sell us products which will make us
appear younger, slimmer, and have more hair on our heads. Our natural
ability to detect “huxterism” easily spotsthe CAGW scammmers
who preach “do as I say, not as I do”.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Notify me of followup comments via email. You can also subscribe without commenting.