|

This guys says Boston bombings might be scarier than 9/11

BH6vVVWCIAIK4Q7

I don’t fully agree with THIS PIECE by Ron Fournier, but I pass it along for your consideration:

The Oklahoma City bombing in April 1995 and the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were knee-buckling blows that led to an obsession over domestic security and foreign wars that will mark—and mar—our generation. The last mass terrorist assault on U.S. soil was carried out by Maj. Nidal M. Hassan, an Army psychiatrist with loose connections to al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, who fatally shot 13 people and wounded 30 more at Fort Hood, Texas, in November 2009.

There were attacks thwarted by the swelling ranks of federal police: The so-called shoe bomber, Richard Reid; an attempt to bomb the New York City subway system in 2009; and an unexploded car bomb in Times Square in 2010.

Boston is another bridge too far. The Boston Marathon and its competitors reflect the best of America—always striving, forever resilient, and, as measured by population and cultural significance, enormous.

You might say it’s unfair to compare Boston’s relatively low death toll to 9/11 and Oklahoma City, much less to the thousands of casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the daily total of gun deaths on U.S. streets.

But the Boston attack is notable not for the number of deaths, but for its social significance. It’s one thing—a dastardly, evil thing—to strike symbols of economic and military power. It’s another to hit the heart of America. Death at the finish line in Boston makes every place (and everybody) less secure.

Malls.

Churches.

Schools.

(Snip)

From the nation’s founding, America has had two sharply delineated lives: one public and one private. The latter is meant to be safe and sacrosanct, part of what Thomas Jefferson called “the pursuit of Happiness.” The public life is rowdy and partisan, even violent as reflected in the Civil War. “What happened in Boston,” said Meg Mott, professor of politics at Marlboro College in Vermont, “is that the private life got blown up and hit deep in the heart of our bifurcated American lives. The lines were blurred, and that’s scary.”

They targeted life. They targeted liberty. Now somebody has attacked pursuit of happiness.

Share:

2 Comments

  1. AmazingScott

    I note that he left out the 1996 Olympic bombing, and mentions several others that a fair number of people don’t recall. I think that this will be a very scary thing for people who need a refresher (as it were) for their ongoing fear, and I’m certain that the media is prepared to feed them all of the processed and refined fear that they can generate. But for most of us this terrible event is just one more on the list of terrible things that we wish hadn’t happened, and we carry on with our lives albeit with new or increased restrictions and/or security precautions. Forgetting the details and fearmongering is a part of the healing process and we ought to embrace it.

    That’s why we’re a great country- they can hit us pretty hard on occasion but we don’t fall down and we don’t freak out. We find them as quickly as possible and we crush them (mostly) and pity the foo’ who gets in the way. In that sense it makes us a better place, because we can drop the petty squabbles about politics and work together on a common cause… can’t we?

  2. Brian Opsahl

    Yes we pull together when confronted with this kind of attack, I remember how proud I was of the way we all pulled together for the 911 attack Republicans and Democrats

    Today I think it would take a nuclear attack to bring the Republicans to the table and nothing less. thats very sad for our Country.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>