The first pilgrims to celebrate Thanksgiving in America were French


Five years ago this week, popular historian Kenneth C. Davis (author of the book shown above) wrote an INTERESTING PIECE for The New York Times about an American Thanksgiving that pre-dated the one celebrated by the Brits who had arrived aboard the Mayflower:

To commemorate the arrival of the first pilgrims to America’s shores, a June date would be far more appropriate, accompanied perhaps by coq au vin and a nice Bordeaux. After all, the first European arrivals seeking religious freedom in the “New World” were French. And they beat their English counterparts by 50 years. That French settlers bested the Mayflower Pilgrims may surprise Americans raised on our foundational myth, but the record is clear.

Long before the Pilgrims sailed in 1620, another group of dissident Christians sought a haven in which to worship freely. These French Calvinists, or Huguenots, hoped to escape the sectarian fighting between Catholics and Protestants that had bloodied France since 1560.

Landing in balmy Florida in June of 1564, at what a French explorer had earlier named the River of May (now the St. Johns River near Jacksonville), the French émigrés promptly held a service of “thanksgiving.” Carrying the seeds of a new colony, they also brought cannons to fortify the small, wooden enclosure they named Fort Caroline, in honor of their king, Charles IX.

In short order, these French pilgrims built houses, a mill and bakery, and apparently even managed to press some grapes into a few casks of wine. At first, relationships with the local Timucuans were friendly, and some of the French settlers took native wives and soon acquired the habit of smoking a certain local “herb.” Food, wine, women — and tobacco by the sea, no less. A veritable Gallic paradise.

Except, that is, to the Spanish, who had other visions for the New World. In 1565, King Philip II of Spain issued orders to “hang and burn the Lutherans” (then a Spanish catchall term for Protestants) and dispatched Adm. Pedro Menéndez to wipe out these French heretics who had taken up residence on land claimed by the Spanish — and who also had an annoying habit of attacking Spanish treasure ships as they sailed by.

Leading this holy war with a crusader’s fervor, Menéndez established St. Augustine and ordered what local boosters claim is the first parish Mass celebrated in the future United States. Then he engineered a murderous assault on Fort Caroline, in which most of the French settlers were massacred. Menéndez had many of the survivors strung up under a sign that read, “I do this not as to Frenchmen but as to heretics.” A few weeks later, he ordered the execution of more than 300 French shipwreck survivors at a site just south of St. Augustine, now marked by an inconspicuous national monument called Fort Matanzas, from the Spanish word for “slaughters.”

With this, America’s first pilgrims disappeared from the pages of history. Casualties of Europe’s murderous religious wars, they fell victim to Anglophile historians who erased their existence as readily as they demoted the Spanish settlement of St. Augustine to second-class status behind the later English colonies in Jamestown and Plymouth.


1 Comment

  1. What a violent beginning for our nation. By the way, I never heard of this angle to our country’s beginnings until now. I did know the Spanish had a great influence on the origins of what is now known as Florida, but didn’t know the supposed details.

    What other supposed historical events have different origins than the official stories we’ve been fed? And then I get criticized and called conspiritorial and get baited with articles by “keep the official story alive” shills like that author William Saletan, who wrote that article in a rag that calls itself, New Scientist. What an official title for a rag. Kind of like the creationist organization that calls itself The Discovery Institute. Nobody would ever question a place called The Discovery Institute, that would be sacreligious. The Discovery Institute? The Discovery Channel? They must be the same organization is what is implied. One is legitimate in its endeavor to seek truth and knowledge, the other is a cover organization for religious zealots who think they can destroy the evolution theory. But I digress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *