Them Publicans has got a grammar problem


I ran across an article today in which U.S. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, chair of the House Republican Conference,  referred to “a Democrat party that has no interest in working with Republicans…”

Such rhetoric prompts me, for the umpteenth time in the past six years, to offer Rodgers and her fellow GOPers a grammar lesson:

The name of the oldest political party in America is the Democratic Party of the United States. It’s members are known as “Democrats” (a noun).

Grammatically proper references to the party, its plans, its proposals, etc., require the use of the adjective “Democratic,” not the noun “Democrat.”

There is no such thing as “the Democrat Party,” or “Democrat leadership,” or “Democrat agenda” or any other construction in which “Democrat” is used to modify a word or phrase. In such cases, the correct usage is “Democratic.”

Right-wingers, however, seem to think that “Democrat” as an adjective somehow sounds less euphonious, less respectable and  more pejorative than “Democratic.” So, grammatical considerations notwithstanding, they misuse the one word and shun the other. And when they hear any fellow rightist use these words correctly, it grates on them.

The genesis of this Democrat-as-an-adjective silliness is not entirely clear. According to one theory, it all started with Sen. Joseph McCarthy, the infamous red-baiter and witch-hunter of the mid-19th century. Others say it can be traced to the late 1950s when a man named Meade Alcorn, chairman of the Republican National Committee, issued a directive to his minions to thereafter avoid use of the word “Democratic.”

McCarthy’s example or Alcorn’s admonition, whichever it was, has been heeded to this day among the party’s more zealous elements. And woe to him or her who dares stray from this orthodoxy.

Jay Nordlinger, senior editor of the conservative National Review, has written of the guff he gets from some readers for his refusal to misuse “Democrat.” And right-wing writer John L. Perry has conspicuously refused to go along with those who “abuse consciously or misuse ignorantly” the D-word.

The late Sen. Sam Ervin once said: “I have been trying to reform Republicans all my life and have had virtually no success, but I would like for them to adopt good grammar and quit using the noun ‘Democrat’ in lieu of the adjective ‘Democratic.’ If I can teach the Republicans that much grammar, I will feel that my effort to educate them has not been entirely in vain.”



  1. Whenever the right-wing swine refer to the ‘democrat’ party they are, in fact, insulting democrats – and the pigs know it.

    It’s something they’ve only been doing for the last ten years or so, and quite intentional.

    If some sanctimonious right-wing freak wants to get upset at how I’m characterizing them, grab a box of tissue, ’cause I really don’t give a damn.

    If you’re going to push someone don’t be surprised when you get knocked down in return.

  2. Del Wasso has the ability to read the minds of every single person who doesn’t know the difference between Democrat and Democratic.

    Pretty impressive. He should go on the road with that act.

    • Ed Meadows

      Wellll, I’m a Democrat and I belong to the Democratic Party. Sarah Palin is a Republican and she belongs to the Republican Party. Something strange here, isn’t it?

  3. Ed Meadows

    Wellll, I’m a Democrat and I belong to the Democratic Party. Sarah Palin is a Republican and she belongs to the Republican Party. Something strange here, isn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>