|

Fox News and others of its ilk don’t talk about Chicago murders anymore

IL_SKYLINE

On several occasions over the past year or so (most recently HERE), I’ve posted data debunking the myth that Chicago is America’s murder capital — or even close to any such status.

And now, as we see HERE, the demagogues on Fox News Channel suddenly have become silent on the issue of homicides in the Windy City:

Someone alert Bill O’Reilly, Matt Drudge, Michelle Malkin and the rest of the right-wing media team that spent last year alternately belittling and hysterically hyping Chicago crime: their argument just fell apart.

Conservatives, led by O’Reilly, Drudge, and Malkin, callously used Chicago crime to attack President Obama and push back against his support for stronger gun laws. Pointing out that Obama’s hometown is Chicago and his former chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, is the city’s mayor, they frequently highlighted the fact that the city struggled with well-publicized gang shootings despite some of the tightest laws in the country. The right tagged Chicago as a gun control test case and deemed it a miserable failure… 

O’Reilly has alternately compared Chicago’s murder rate to “many Holocausts,” and “Afghanistan.” The Drudge Report linked to 134 “CHICAGOLAND” crime headlines last year, all meant to convey the image of a lawless city on the verge of bloody collapse. And Malkin let loose with her usual invective, denouncing Chicago as one of many Democratic-run “hellholes”; urban centers teeming with “juvenile delinquency, organized crime, ruinous government dependency, corruption and out-of-control spending.”

(Snip)

But suddenly the Chicago taunts have gone quiet. Suddenly the claims that strict gun laws are useless and that Democratic mayors oversee killings zones have disappeared. No more “CHICAGO LAND” links or cries of “Holocaust,” and Malkin has for now stopped referring to Chicago as “America’s Bloody City.”

Why? Because even world-class misinformers like those would have a tough time making a case against “Obama’s Chicago,” given the fact that the murder rate there last year fell to its lowest level since Lyndon Johnson was president while the booming metropolis welcomed a record number  of 46 million tourists last year.

That’s right, despite the endless right-wing attacks on Chicago and the permanent conservative depiction of the Second City as a hell hole, Chicago last year experienced the fewest murders since 1965; 413 in 2013. (Context: Chicago at its worst tallied 943 murders in 1992.) The city’s overall crime rate in last year fell to a level not seen since 1972, and every one of the Chicago’s 22 police districts registered a decrease in crime last year.

“The drop is legitimately stunning,” noted The Atlantic’s Philip Bump.

Chicago’s rapidly falling murder and crime rate stands as part of a larger pattern with major urban centers such as New York, Los Angeles, Philadephia and Detroit all posting sharp reductions last year. It’s a trend that completely undercuts right-wing spin about urban crime under Obama, as well as the alleged futility of gun laws…

In Chicago, the police have been focusing on seizing illegal guns, confiscating more than 6,500 last year. The fact that getting guns off the streets in Chicago has helped decrease murders also frightens pro-gun ideologues. “Conservative critics,” of course, insist gun law efforts don’t effect the crime rate.

For years, Obama’s critics have wanted to use Chicago as the centerpiece for a debate about guns and crime in America. With its crime and murder rate down dramatically, do O’Reilly, Drudge and Malkin still want to have that debate?

Their silence suggests the answer is no. 

Share:

2 Comments

  1. Hank hill

    Why is this commentator so angry?? He should be happy to see the murder rate drop. He, instead seems to be upset because he’s not received opposition from”the right”. Which means he can’t continue to go on a rant. In any event, it’s ironic that a Federal Judge found another piece of Chicago’s firearm ban unconstitutional. That’s because all of the anti-gun bans and an arrogantly hostile administration towards legal firearm ownership, only effect the law abiding. Its a good thing that the murder rate is decreasing, but is not correlated with an increase in anti-gun laws as gang members are the number one offenders of such laws. I’d say more attributable to good efficient policing and judges actually administering stronger sentences to gun offenders. And when the suicide rate is removed from ” acts of violence” that number is sure to skew the results.

  2. Brandon

    I’m confused exactly how this article can relate the gun laws to the drop in Chicago’s crime rate. No new gun laws were passed in Chicago. In fact, they had one of their signature gun laws ruled unconstitutional. (Handgun Ban)

    Yet, the crime rate drops.

    The only thing this proves is that there is no direct correlation between gun laws and the crime rate.

    I have a hunch you WOULD find a correlation between the crime rate and police activity/overtime though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CAPTCHA Image

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>