<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.4" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Applesauce</title>
	<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce</link>
	<description>Pat Cunningham offers an unabashedly liberal perspective on national politics. A note of caution: The language gets a litttle salty on some of the sites to which this blog links. So, don't say you weren't warned. By the way, this blog's name is inspired by the Will Rogers quote, "All politics is applesauce."</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Catholic bishops endorse health-care bill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/catholic-bishops-endorse-health-care-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/catholic-bishops-endorse-health-care-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/catholic-bishops-endorse-health-care-bill/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
THIS seems pretty significant.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/000000usccb.jpg" title="000000usccb.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/000000usccb.jpg" alt="000000usccb.jpg" /></a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1109/Bishops_endorse_the_bill.html">THIS</a></strong> seems pretty significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/catholic-bishops-endorse-health-care-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s weekly address is about Ft. Hood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/obamas-weekly-address-is-about-ft-hood/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/obamas-weekly-address-is-about-ft-hood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ft. Hood]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/obamas-weekly-address-is-about-ft-hood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFFmeDw4wfc

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="vvqbox vvqyoutube" style="width:425px;height:355px;">
<p id="vvq4af67ba3cec80"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFFmeDw4wfc">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFFmeDw4wfc</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/07/obamas-weekly-address-is-about-ft-hood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Cantor&#8217;s apostasy risks wrath of wingnuts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/eric-cantors-apostasy-risks-wrath-of-wingnuts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/eric-cantors-apostasy-risks-wrath-of-wingnuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[teabaggers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/eric-cantors-apostasy-risks-wrath-of-wingnuts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 Uh-oh! Rep. Eric Cantor, the second-ranking Republican in the U.S. House, is DISSING the teabaggers and Rush Limbaugh.
 How soon will the loonies label him a RINO?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/eric_cantor_1.jpg" title="eric_cantor_1.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/eric_cantor_1.jpg" alt="eric_cantor_1.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p> Uh-oh! Rep. Eric Cantor, the second-ranking Republican in the U.S. House, is <strong><a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/11/cantor-says-tea-partys-dachau-photos-inappropriate-takes-issue-with-limbaugh.php?ref=fpa">DISSING</a></strong> the teabaggers and Rush Limbaugh.</p>
<p> How soon will the loonies label him a RINO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/eric-cantors-apostasy-risks-wrath-of-wingnuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WorldNutDaily tries to tie Ft. Hood shooter to Obama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/worldnutdaily-tries-to-tie-ft-hood-shooter-to-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/worldnutdaily-tries-to-tie-ft-hood-shooter-to-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 21:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ft. Hood]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/worldnutdaily-tries-to-tie-ft-hood-shooter-to-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
THIS KIND OF THING was inevitable, I suppose.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/wndshootertransition-20091106.jpg" title="wndshootertransition-20091106.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/wndshootertransition-20091106.jpg" alt="wndshootertransition-20091106.jpg" /></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200911060011">THIS KIND OF THING</a></strong> was inevitable, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/worldnutdaily-tries-to-tie-ft-hood-shooter-to-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another example of government trampling our religious rights?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/another-example-of-government-trampling-our-religious-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/another-example-of-government-trampling-our-religious-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[religious rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/another-example-of-government-trampling-our-religious-rights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 One of our semi-regular commenters here at Applesauce has opined, without any supporting evidence, that the tragedy at Ft. Hood is the result of the U.S. military infringing on the religious rights of its personnel.
 One wonders what this fellow might think of THIS CASE, in which it is alleged that government finger-printing requirements are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/fingerprint.jpg" title="fingerprint.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/fingerprint.jpg" alt="fingerprint.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p> One of our semi-regular commenters here at Applesauce has opined, without any supporting evidence, that the tragedy at Ft. Hood is the result of the U.S. military infringing on the religious rights of its personnel.</p>
<p> One wonders what this fellow might think of <strong><a href="http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/teacher_wont_fingerprint">THIS CASE</a></strong>, in which it is alleged that government finger-printing requirements are a violation of religious freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/another-example-of-government-trampling-our-religious-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jobless rate, poll numbers spell doom for Reagan, er, I mean Obama</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-poll-numbers-spell-doom-for-reagan-er-i-mean-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-poll-numbers-spell-doom-for-reagan-er-i-mean-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-poll-numbers-spell-doom-for-reagan-er-i-mean-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 Follow me on this:
 Unemployment figures released today are said in some quarters to portend a one-term presidency for Barack Obama.
 Another harbinger of tough-sledding for the president looms in the likelihood that his approval rating in the Gallup poll will soon slip below 50 percent. (It&#8217;s at 52 percent as this is written.)
 But before we write [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/reagan_obama_320.jpg" title="reagan_obama_320.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/reagan_obama_320.jpg" alt="reagan_obama_320.jpg" /></a></p>
<p> Follow me on this:</p>
<p> Unemployment figures released today are said in some quarters to portend a one-term presidency for Barack Obama.</p>
<p> Another harbinger of tough-sledding for the president looms in the likelihood that his approval rating in the Gallup poll will soon slip below 50 percent. (It&#8217;s at 52 percent as this is written.)</p>
<p> But before we write Obama&#8217;s political obituary, let&#8217;s put these numbers in historical perspective.</p>
<p> First of all, we have the fact that the current rate of joblessness is the highest since 1983. If I recall correctly, that was the third year of Ronald Reagan&#8217;s presidency. And in the following year, he was elected to a second term.</p>
<p> Nor should we read too much into Obama&#8217;s approval rating falling below 50 percent (if, in fact, that happens). History shows that two out of the three presidents who won re-election in the past three decades (Reagan and Bill Clinton) both saw their Gallup approval numbers slip below 50 percent during their first year in office.</p>
<p> Mind you, I&#8217;m not saying that Obama won&#8217;t face tough challenges in a re-election bid in 2012. Indeed, he might not make it. But let&#8217;s not forget how grim the situation looked for Reagan before he won a second term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-poll-numbers-spell-doom-for-reagan-er-i-mean-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homophobes are a dying breed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/homophobes-are-a-dying-breed/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/homophobes-are-a-dying-breed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/homophobes-are-a-dying-breed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 As we&#8217;ve pointed out here before, opposition to gay marriage is much more common among older Americans than younger folks.
 Eventually, then, most of the homophobes will just die off.
 HERE&#8217;s a chart that dramatizes the demographic gulf on the issue.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/homophobia_is_gay.png" title="homophobia_is_gay.png"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/homophobia_is_gay.png" alt="homophobia_is_gay.png" /></a></p>
<p> As we&#8217;ve pointed out here before, opposition to gay marriage is much more common among older Americans than younger folks.</p>
<p> Eventually, then, most of the homophobes will just die off.</p>
<p><strong> <a href="http://contexts.org/socimages/2009/11/05/support-for-same-sex-marriage-by-age-and-state/">HERE</a></strong>&#8217;s a chart that dramatizes the demographic gulf on the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/homophobes-are-a-dying-breed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opponents of government-run health care suddenly find need to avail themselves of same</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/opponents-of-government-run-health-care-suddenly-find-need-to-avail-themselves-of-same/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/opponents-of-government-run-health-care-suddenly-find-need-to-avail-themselves-of-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[teabaggers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/opponents-of-government-run-health-care-suddenly-find-need-to-avail-themselves-of-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
 While I don&#8217;t want to make light of people facing medical emergencies, I can&#8217;t help but note the delicious irony in THIS ACCOUNT of a teabagger rally staged yesterday at the Capitol in Washington:
 &#8221;By the time it was over, medics had administered government-run health care to at least five people in the crowd who were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/healthcare-1.jpg" title="healthcare-1.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/healthcare-1.jpg" alt="healthcare-1.jpg" /></a></p>
<p> While I don&#8217;t want to make light of people facing medical emergencies, I can&#8217;t help but note the delicious irony in <strong><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/05/AR2009110504566.html">THIS ACCOUNT </a></strong>of a teabagger rally staged yesterday at the Capitol in Washington:</p>
<p> &#8221;By the time it was over, medics had administered government-run health care to at least five people in the crowd who were stricken as they denounced government-run health care.&#8221;</p>
<p> UPDATE: By the way, Michele Bachmann is <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/06/bachmann-rally-organic/"><strong>FALSELY DECLARING</strong> </a>that the aforementioned rally was completely spontaneous and &#8220;was nothing that we organized, nothing that we planned. We didn’t order one bus, one carload. Nothing. Complete word of mouth.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/opponents-of-government-run-health-care-suddenly-find-need-to-avail-themselves-of-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart parodies Glenn Beck&#8217;s conspiratorialism</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jon-stewart-parodies-glenn-becks-conspiratorialism/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jon-stewart-parodies-glenn-becks-conspiratorialism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jon-stewart-parodies-glenn-becks-conspiratorialism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
THIS STUFF is hilarious. Be sure to watch the video, wherein Stewart perfectly mimics the Beck style.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/300_stewart_jon2_lc_092108.jpg" title="300_stewart_jon2_lc_092108.jpg"><img src="http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/files/2009/11/300_stewart_jon2_lc_092108.jpg" alt="300_stewart_jon2_lc_092108.jpg" /></a></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/06/jon-stewart-does-glenn-be_n_348129.html">THIS STUFF</a></strong> is hilarious. Be sure to watch the video, wherein Stewart perfectly mimics the Beck style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/jon-stewart-parodies-glenn-becks-conspiratorialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner mistakes Declaration for Constitution</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/boehner-mistakes-declaration-for-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/boehner-mistakes-declaration-for-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pat Cunningham</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/boehner-mistakes-declaration-for-constitution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How embarrassing is this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvKOQA6qrhE

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How embarrassing is this?</p>
<div class="vvqbox vvqyoutube" style="width:425px;height:355px;">
<p id="vvq4af67ba410196"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvKOQA6qrhE">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvKOQA6qrhE</a></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/applesauce/2009/11/06/boehner-mistakes-declaration-for-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
