Class warfare out of place in shaky economic times
February 28th, 2009 at 05:21pm Annette LaCross
When I was young, my grandfather would tell stories of a heroic band of freedom fighters who earned a place in history with their message of justice and fair play, with their dedication to the cause of the American worker.
Today, many of their names are lost in the annals of history: Richard Frankensteen, Robert Kanter, Henry Kraus. One of the greatest of those young warriors is largely unknown today.
But while he lived, and for years after his death in the 1970s, Walter Reuther was an icon among American workers, catapulted to greatness in the 1930s as he strove to unionize the auto industry.
My grandfather was one of the workers who helped break GM’s anti-union resolve during the 1937 sit-down strike at the General Motors Corp. plant in Flint, Mich. Reuther’s brother, Roy, helped organize that one.
When I covered the auto industry in Detroit, I came to know many of their contemporaries, men who, like my grandfather, hadn’t led the charge but fought in it all the same.
They took part in the 1932 Hunger March, when thousands of workers — hungry and desperate after being tossed unceremoniously off the job as the Depression tightened its grip — marched to Henry Ford’s massive Rouge complex in Dearborn, Mich.
Five died when the marchers were met by Ford’s personal “Service Department” as well as police and firefighters, who used fists, clubs, tear gas and fire hoses to disperse the crowd.
I still own a copy of the very first agreement between the fledgling UAW and the virulently anti-union Ford, a tiny booklet of few pages written at the end of the 1930s.
The man who gave it to me, the last surviving member of that first negotiating team, told me to remember.
“They were good men,” he said, his voice breaking.
I promised I would. I meant it.
I’m proud of all of those men. I’m proud of my grandfather, who helped fight the contempt and negligence with which companies treated their blue-collar workers.
Sadly, those noble beginnings are all but forgotten, hazy and indistinct after decades of concessions led to fat, insular unions and corporate managers who failed to recognize the value of those workers.
But saddest of all, I think, is the us-against-them mentality that still plagues both sides.
It was necessary once. It isn’t any longer, especially when the company that feeds both sides teeters on the brink.
If a country divided against itself cannot stand, could we really expect a different outcome from a mere corporation?
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized


1 Comment Add your own
1. Egyas | February 28th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
If only more people would understand this. I have become very much anti-union in general. I have always said that the Unions were very much needed when they were formed, and their protections were needed very much.
Today, the paradigm has shifted. Unions too often protect incompetent and non-producing workers, and demand outrageous salaries and benefits from companies, regardless of the state of the economy. All too often, no0n unions employees are just thankful to have a job, while union members are demanding raises higher then the cost of living, etc.
Not to mention that Federal employment laws already provide the same protections that the early Unions fought for. After that, it’s just greed, plain and simple. The revolution those early union leaders/members fought for was won. Too bad the war didn’t end there.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed