Who has the time to post comments?
August 12th, 2008 at 09:03am Linda Grist Cunningham
Web site “comments” can be — though often are not — important insights into what’s going on in a community’s collective brain. And, because comments are usually posted anonymously, the common wisdom has been that anonymity breeds a certain clarity and credibility since the poster doesn’t fear identification.
Yeah, it works that way in my dreams. It works that way in some Ph.D. candidate’s thesis. It doesn’t work that way — or not very often — in the real world. In the real world, there’s a preponderance of posters with way too much time on their hands and a deep-rooted hostility in their brains. They get ugly with each other and the world in general. They can’t express an idea that doesn’t drip with most every “-ism” and phobia. They are black holes sucking the rest of us into their unholy and unhappy vortex.
We take down the posts and ban the posters, exercises in futility that I’d liken to herding cats or containing Silly Putty. But we try, mightily. Our Terms of Use help, and best is mine: My house, my rules. If I don’t like what you’re posting, you must go somewhere else to post it.
Today, Howard Owens, director of digital publishing for GateHouse Media, shared this laugh-out-loud “article” from the Onion, the satirical weekly famous on college campuses (and printed here at the Register Star, by the way.) Some days, I am pretty sure this is what most comments posters are doing. Enjoy.
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized


2 Comments Add your own
1. Greg | August 12th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
Gotta love The Onion! That was hilarious — and painfully true.
2. John Biltmore | August 13th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Linda - I sure hope you are referencing only the most extreme, most offensive, most ridiculous commenters. For while I support your standard — my house, my rules — it seems to run at counter purposes to having a comment section in the first place. In other words, if you reserve the right to remove comments, and you should, the standards should be the same for each of your bloggers. Otherwise it’s rather capricious and takes away from the open forum you think you have created.
Please don’t misunderstand. I am not making a “no limits” argument. For instance, there was a guy on Pat Cunningham’s blog who hurled a certain ugly 4-letter word. I think that guy should be banned forever.
It’s just that, to me, it’s kind of strange to invite people to comment, to give them this forum where the rules are available but not particularly prominent, and then criticize them when things go haywire.
Just my .02.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed