Editor’s Note
Back in the old days — that’s less than a decade and before there were such things as blogs and interactive conversations with readers — editors used to respond to their newspaper readers with an “editor’s note.” Sometimes it clarified a point made in a letter to the editor. Sometimes it offered a correction. Sometimes it was just a simple explanation. An editor’s note was a handful of sentences; maybe a four or five paragraphs. It was always a personal link between the editor and the reader. Only difference between it and today’s blog is the immediacy and the platform. Welcome to Editor’s Note.

Archive for August 22nd, 2008

Time to heal — and move on

4 comments August 22nd, 2008

There’s not a thing I can write about this week’s layoffs at the Rockford Register Star that won’t get me smacked in the face by someone. For every decision I made, for every comment I write, someone — often anonymous — will have a “better” one and it frequently starts with “You’re the one who ought to have been fired….” Yeah, whatever; I’m not asking for sympathy. As my dad said: That’s why they call it work. If it were easy and everyone could do it, they’d be doing it.

What really annoys me, though, are the people who seem to rejoice in the pain of others. I am astounded by the venom that follows such announcements, and I’ve seen it happen enough times with other companies that when we posted our layoff story, I turned off “comments.” That didn’t sit well with some folks. As I told one poster who wanted to comment on the story, we’re hurting enough right now that I decided we didn’t need to listen to what were sure to be rants that we deserved to die. Frankly, I may do the same thing for other companies, if, heaven forbid, they face troubled times. There simply is something deeply wrong with people who get a charge out of “kicking you when you’re down.”

Anyone who has ever been without a job through no fault of their own (and I have, by the way) knows the turmoil, the feeling of being lost in a maze. That’s true for the survivors, too. I saw how tough it was for the staff in the News Tower — in every department — to get back to work minutes after the layoffs spared them. As I said to the newsroom staff Monday afternoon: Wewill have to grieve while we work. There will be a Web site today and a newspaper tomorrow. That’s our job.

As the weekend comes around, where do we start on Monday? Actually, the answer is simple: We’ll be the Rock River Valley’s primary source for news, information and advertising in print and online. That doesn’t change.

Our success in connecting with 80 percent of the adults in the market doesn’t rest solely on how many people we have, but on the quality of what each of us does. Quantity does matter; I’d be stupid to think otherwise. But quality will trump quantity. When we move forward, it will be the quality of what we do that matters: the quality of our local news content, the quality of the customers we connect to advertisers, the quality of our customer service.

When the dust settles, we will be fewer. We will not be less.

Where are the burglars?

15 comments August 22nd, 2008

Quick update on an earlier post: We’re still waiting for answers to our (your) questions about the flurry of home burglaries in northeast Rockford. We first asked for details, then filed a Freedom of Information Act with Chief Chet Epperson, and then a second one. I asked Mayor Larry mid-week if he’d jog things loose.

We’re not asking for insider information here. Just a few basic questions: what happened, where did it happen, how many times did it happen over what period of time? What makes this so unusual that a press release was warranted? What are the police doing about it? Do they have information? Hardly a line-up of questions that would jeopardize any ongoing investigation.

I have some hope that we’ll get something soon. Although the chief yesterday denied a similar set of FOIAs for information on the department’s Taser policy, it’s my understanding, as of last night, that we may get some of the Taser answers without the FOIA.

I certainly hope so. The tit-for-tat practice of demanding a FOIA for basic public record information is goofy. It wastes time, paper and resources. Just answer the darn questions.