Editor’s Note
Back in the old days — that’s less than a decade and before there were such things as blogs and interactive conversations with readers — editors used to respond to their newspaper readers with an “editor’s note.” Sometimes it clarified a point made in a letter to the editor. Sometimes it offered a correction. Sometimes it was just a simple explanation. An editor’s note was a handful of sentences; maybe a four or five paragraphs. It was always a personal link between the editor and the reader. Only difference between it and today’s blog is the immediacy and the platform. Welcome to Editor’s Note.

No. No. No. No rebate checks

October 21st, 2008 at 03:28pm Linda Grist Cunningham

Memo to Congress and President Bush: Stop encouraging Americans to buy stuff. Profligate spending at our favorite stores got us part way into this economic morass. You should not have done those rebate checks earlier this year (lot of good that did), and you certainly ought not do it again.

That “send ‘em another check so they can spend it” philosophy is bad government, bad economics and just plain bad karma. President Bush said Monday he’s “open” to hearing about another round of rebate checks. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and some Congressional Democrats, along with others looking greedily at retail cash, are trying to figure out a way to send rebates to our pocketbooks. Estimates range from $150 billion to $300 billion. Egads, are they nuts?

I remain a supporter of the various economic recovery plans that fall loosely under the “big bailout” umbrella. I think they were the absolute only thing that could have been done on a very short time frame to soften the landing as the global economy catapults off the cliff.

But, we do not need more cash in our pockets to buy stuff. We need jobs. Jobs, you hear? Help our companies make our jobs safe. Make new jobs, including public works jobs. (How about a plan to fix our infrastructure?)

With a job, we stand a decent chance we can keep paying the rent, the mortgage, the doctor’s bills, the groceries and the utilities. If we can do that, we can scrape by for the next couple of years as the global economy rights itself. We might even have some of our own cash left over to spend. It won’t be pretty, and we probably won’t be buying another smart phone, but we’ll be OK. If there’s $300 billion lying around, make — and help companies protect — jobs.

This rebate thing is tantamount to “let them eat cake if they have no bread.” Jobs. Bread. Not one dime for cake.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. pundit  |  October 21st, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    I wholeheartedly agree! I would rather see that money used for infrastructure. That would create road construction jobs. Also, it would get the manufacturing jobs back as well as the parts factories going. These would be good paying jobs and we would be repairing our infrastucture. Just think of all of the people who would now be gainfully employed and able to keep their homes and use their purchase power without a stimulus package. Addtionally, people would be able to save. Needless to say Uncle Sam would be collecting more tax revenue.

  • 2. Juice  |  October 21st, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    The money needs to be targeted FOR REAL US jobs and keep the money here, not for people to blow at Wal-Mart on chinese goods. Pelosi always slips in pork and redistribution. If you are going to call it a Tax “Rebate” then do that. Keep it clean and not other agendas.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Security Code:

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Marketplace
Classifieds
Jobs
Cars
Homes
Coupons
Your Town
Rockford
Rockton
Roscoe
South Beloit
Winnebago County