Editor’s Note
Back in the old days — that’s less than a decade and before there were such things as blogs and interactive conversations with readers — editors used to respond to their newspaper readers with an “editor’s note.” Sometimes it clarified a point made in a letter to the editor. Sometimes it offered a correction. Sometimes it was just a simple explanation. An editor’s note was a handful of sentences; maybe a four or five paragraphs. It was always a personal link between the editor and the reader. Only difference between it and today’s blog is the immediacy and the platform. Welcome to Editor’s Note.

Too critical of Bush? Depends …

January 8th, 2009 at 12:29pm Linda Grist Cunningham

The Pew Research Center does some of the best bench-marking research in the country. The latest research, released today, says, in part: “… Still, a plurality (41%) says press coverage of Bush has been fair, while a substantial majority (61%) says the same about coverage of Obama. About one-in-four find coverage of both not critical enough.”

The entire report includes the breakdowns by party identification. Perhaps, needless to say, party affiliation does change the stats — a lot. But, the important work of the Pew research is in its ability to track the “big picture” or “real people” trends — and that tends to filter out the loudest voices on either end.

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Security Code:

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Marketplace
Classifieds
Jobs
Cars
Homes
Coupons
Your Town
Rockford
Rockton
Roscoe
South Beloit
Winnebago County