Open up those meetings, boys and girls
May 11th, 2009 at 03:43pm Linda Grist Cunningham
Here’s why I am ticked off — and why you should be, too. Remember the MetroCentre, that time-sucking, controversy-creating civic center downtown? The one that needs a taxpayer revenue stream? The one that now has a newly created ad-hoc committee reviewing its finances?
That one. Well, the city’s official position is “all discussions by the ad hoc committee are behind closed doors.” Why? Well, for starters, because they want to. That’s the real reason. They want to. They do not want you or the media there.
They can cite a court case to allow them to close the meetings, though by no means is that court case definitive. So, by gosh and by golly, they can, so they will.
Your elected public officials have no intention of walking their talk. They tell you (and us here in the News Tower) they believe in transparency. That they want open, public government. That no good comes of doing the public’s business in secret.
Then they go about creating public-private partnerships that allow them to circumvent Illinois’ Open Public Meetings Act. They create ad hoc committees, again to circumvent the OPMA. They cite lawyerly reasons why they can jolly well lock out the great unwashed, unelected and just plain un-powerful.
Not one of them does anything to open the doors. The OPMA states clearly that meetings are presumed open. The law says they “may” be closed for a handful of reasons. No where does the OPMA say they MUST be closed. So every governmental and quasi-governmental meeting in the region could be open.
But, these guys work hard, very hard, to close them because they don’t want you and me to know what they are doing. They pass the buck, they beg to be allowed to brainstorm in private so they don’t look stupid (as if….). They say they don’t want to reveal stuff to competitors or mess up a contract.
They want, they say, the freedom to talk among themselves without anyone hearing them.
Rockford’s mayor, Larry Morrissey, touted openness in both his campaigns. If he’s for open public meetings, then he ought to tell his legal beagle Patrick Hayes and administration side kick Jim Ryan to get with the program. I think the mayor wants the meetings closed, too; he’s just letting the front guys do their thing.
I called the mayor’s office and left a heads up that this column and blog post were coming. I figured I owed him at least that. Reporter Jeff Kolkey and Editorial Page Editor Wally Haas also have pieces of this story. Jeff on the news side; Wally on editorial. Senior Editor Chuck Sweeny is likely to weigh in as well.
There are three ways to open the MetroCentre ad hoc committee meetings. The mayor can do so. As of this writing, he’s choosing not to. The city council can introduce and pass a resolution to open them up. So far, the alderman are running for cover. Heaven forbid that they stand up for open government.And, third, I can take them to court. Perhaps they will decide that spending tax dollars on a court case would be silly. Just open the meetings, boys and girls. Save everyone a lot of hassle.
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized


2 Comments Add your own
1. unmanager | May 11th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
I must copy comments on the story page….
It’s a sorry state of affairs if the RRStar accepts Hayes jibber-jabber….
right here….
http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/government/openmeet.pdf
…”Meeting’ is defined as ‘any gathering of a majority of a quorum of the members
of a public body held for the purpose of discussing public business.’ 5 ILCS 120/1.02. ‘Public body’ is defined to include ‘all legislative, executive, administrative or advisory bodies of the
state, counties, townships, cities, villages, incorporated towns, school districts and all other
municipal corporations, boards, bureaus, committees or commissions of this State, and any
subsidiary bodies of any of the foregoing including but not limited to committees and
subcommittees which are supported in whole or in part by tax revenue, or which expend tax
revenue, except the General Assembly and committees or commissions thereof.’
SEE where it EXPLICITLY INCLUDES ‘advisory bodies’….
This newspaper has been strongly advocating increased subsidies to the MetroCentre,they OWE it to readers to PUSH THIS ISSUE,as well,instead of falling for an obviously wrong decision rendered on the part of Patrick Hayes…..
Want MORE?
….’Questions frequently arise about whether the Act covers meetings of various subgroups,
such as committees, subcommittees and advisory bodies. The answer is yes. The statute applies
to ‘any subsidiary bodies of any of the foregoing [public bodies] including but not limited to
committees and subcommittees which are supported in whole or in part by tax revenue, or which
expend tax revenue.’ 5 ILCS 120/1.02…..’
2. mike davis | May 12th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
HI I just note a great deal of huffing and puffing and no substance. What did they talk about at the meeting? If certain aspects are deemed confidential according to the alderman what use is it? What did your reporter hear at the meeting? You made a big deal of it is secret open it open it! The mayor does and what did they say in the meeting? We don’t know ! For all intentional purposes it might as well as been closed because your newspaper didnt report what was said and by whom BIG DEAL its open we need a real newspaper and reporters to cover the story and ask tough questions. How close were we to losing the ice hogs because we didnt pay the franchise fees? When will they make the needed repairs to the ice chillers? How much is the OTW losing because they squeeze the non-profits out and attendence is down significantly? Why don’t community groups use the Cornando (they make them pay for the lights (that the community paid for) and the rent just increased) Report the news that paper was looking a little weak yesterday
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed