<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: huge crowd for beaman updated X3</title>
	<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/15/huge-crowd-for-beaman/</link>
	<description>The judge will see you now. Step into Springfield Bureau Chief Aaron Chambers’ chambers for an insider’s view on Illinois politics and government. No, Chambers isn’t a real judge. At least not in the sense of wearing a robe, wielding a gavel and issuing orders. But like a good judge, Chambers tells it like it is.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: In Chambers &#187; beaman video, audio now online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/15/huge-crowd-for-beaman/#comment-11</link>
		<author>In Chambers &#187; beaman video, audio now online</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/15/huge-crowd-for-beaman/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Background on the case is here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Background on the case is here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiyoshi Martinez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/15/huge-crowd-for-beaman/#comment-9</link>
		<author>Kiyoshi Martinez</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/15/huge-crowd-for-beaman/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I remembering writing a brief on this last year. Should be interesting to see what the S.C. does with this. Although, if I remember correctly,  the defense at the time not present this theory during the initial trial. In any case, it's intriguing to read the follow-up coverage now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembering writing a brief on this last year. Should be interesting to see what the S.C. does with this. Although, if I remember correctly,  the defense at the time not present this theory during the initial trial. In any case, it&#8217;s intriguing to read the follow-up coverage now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
