http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/ The judge will see you now. Step into Springfield Bureau Chief Aaron Chambers’ chambers for an insider’s view on Illinois politics and government. No, Chambers isn’t a real judge. At least not in the sense of wearing a robe, wielding a gavel and issuing orders. But like a good judge, Chambers tells it like it is. Sun, 8 Nov 2009 07:33:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4 http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/#comment-19 In Chambers » Note to Guv: You Bought the Tax Hike Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:57:50 +0000 http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/#comment-19 [...] Yes, the governor rewrote the bill in the sense he suggested the addition of a free-rides-for-seniorsplan. And yes, he did use his power of amendatory veto to facilitate that change to the bill. But he did not veto the tax hike. No, he did not veto the tax hike. (For background on the amendatory veto, go here.) [...] […] Yes, the governor rewrote the bill in the sense he suggested the addition of a free-rides-for-seniorsplan. And yes, he did use his power of amendatory veto to facilitate that change to the bill. But he did not veto the tax hike. No, he did not veto the tax hike. (For background on the amendatory veto, go here.) […]

]]> http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/#comment-15 ArchPundit Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:15:56 +0000 http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/#comment-15 A blog--awesome! I'll link to it here shortly! A blog–awesome! I’ll link to it here shortly!

]]> http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/#comment-13 In Chambers » Trouble could be a-brewin’ Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:26:51 +0000 http://blogs.e-rockford.com/inchambers/2008/01/17/mass-transit-veto-primer/#comment-13 [...] follow my bureau chief’s very informative post, it is possible that lawmakers would approve the amendatory veto to save Chicago [...] […] follow my bureau chief’s very informative post, it is possible that lawmakers would approve the amendatory veto to save Chicago […]

]]>