February 18th, 2008
OK, so this probably isn’t the most important endorsement that U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has earned or will earn in his race for the White House. But it certainly is the creamiest.
That’s right, Obama won the endorsement of none other than Ben and Jerry, the co-founders of Ben and Jerry’s. So grab a spoon, people! If Obama wins, maybe they’ll spread some ice cream love.
From an Obama press release:
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, co-founders of Ben and Jerry’s, publically announced their endorsement of Barack Obama for President today. Joined by U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy, the former John Edwards supporters said they believe Barack Obama is the best candidate to unite America and finally tackle the challenges facing our nation.
“Barack Obama believes that the special interests in Washington shouldn’t drown out the voices and basic needs of Americans,” Greenfield said. “When Barack Obama is President, we will finally have a president who is committed to ensuring all Americans have access to affordable health care and our children get the education they deserve.”
What? Nothing about ice cream for everybody?
February 18th, 2008
You probably already know about U.S. Sen. Barack Obama’s concrete shoe, Tony Rezko.
Obama and Rezko engaged in a kinky real estate deal — Obama bought a mansion on Chicago’s South Side the same day that Rezko’s wife bought an adjacent lot — that is now all the talk on the presidential campaign trail. There’s even a blog dedicated to Rezko.
We may soon be hearing much more about Obama’s ties to Exelon, ComEd’s parent company, too.
A Baltimore Sun columnist reports:
A bigger question is how Obama’s Exelon links might influence his broader electricity policy at the most critical period for U.S. electricity since the 1930s. Exelon, the Illinois version of Baltimore’s Constellation Energy, is one of the country’s biggest megawatt producers, the largest nuclear plant operator and a huge Obama backer through its executives and employees.
Would a President Obama try to reform interstate electricity markets that have soaked consumers in Maryland and other deregulated states, inadequately invested in the future and unjustifiably enriched Exelon, Constellation and other companies? Or would he maintain the Bush administration’s blind eye toward evidence of wholesale-electricity market failure, irregularity and price gouging?
The columnist goes on to scrutinize Obama’s apparent ties to Exelon. Recommended reading, for sure.
UPDATE 1
Bloomberg and the Tribune have more on the Obama/Rezko land deal.
February 18th, 2008
A great pastime at the Capitol is speculating on the objectives and motives of House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago. Madigan seldom speaks in public and he generally is the last of state leaders to show his cards.
When he does show them, he tends to stake out a contrarian position. By positioning himself opposite other interests, he creates leverage to accomplish his goals — whatever they may be.
This spring session, Madigan was the first to show a card when he spread word last week that no major initiative will clear the House, the chamber that he controls, unless it contains language effectively pre-empting Gov. Rod Blagojevich from attaching rules elaborating on its thrust.
It’s uncanny for Madigan to announce such a radical position before the governor has a chance to set forth his own strategy Wednesday in his State of the State/budget address. Then again, Blagojevich and Madigan are great political adversaries. Together with Senate President Emil Jones Jr., a third Chicago Democrat allied with Blagojevich, the two last year faced off in a battle last so fierce that session literally dragged from the spring straight into this year.
But to truly understand the extraordinary nature of Madigan’s pre-emptive strike, you must consider the actual substance of his plan. By requiring all major bills to include language prohibiting the governor or his agencies from attaching administrative rules, the strategy could potentially shut down the legislative process.
In other words, Madigan has kicked off the session with a strategy that may do nothing but disrupt and delay the legislative process.
If Jones continues to side with Blagojevich through this session, he is unlikely to adopt Madigan’s strategy in the Senate. If the Senate rejects the strategy, and Madigan refuses to budge, it will be impossible for the two chambers to agree on legislation. And even if Jones does capitulate, and both the Senate and House do agree on legislation including the no-rules language, the governor could simply veto the language and send each bill back to lawmakers.
Lawmakers would then need to decide whether to override the governor. But I’m getting way ahead of myself here.
The bottom line is that Madigan does not often bluff. If he does bluff, he is not one to quickly go back on it.
Blagojevich and Jones, for their part, don’t tend to quickly swallow Madigan’s wishes.
UPDATE 1
Rep. Chuck Jefferson. D-Rockford, supports Madigan’s new strategy. Jefferson is a member of Madigan’s leadership team, so this is not surprising.
Jefferson echoed the speaker’s position, articulated last week by House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, that the governor directly assaulted the Legislature when he declared that the body’s Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, which reviews the governor’s administrative rules, lacks the power to reject his rules.
“I think it’s a good idea if in fact the governor is going to continue to try and pull the political maneuvers to undercut what JCAR is in place to do,” Jefferson said. “I think it’s to the governor’s advantage at this point, but he doesn’t seem to think so.”
UPDATE 2
Rockford GOP Sen. Dave Syverson also supports Madigan’s strategy, at least the concept, he said.
Syverson said state agencies have misinterpreted his bills when they write the rules, but he could not think of any examples. He said he is then forced to pass another bill to clarify the first legislation.
“I agree with the Speaker to the extent that we need to put more in there in regards to the major issues because the governor has taken more leeway to expand definitions … taking it way beyond what the intent was and we need to rein that in,” Syverson said.
“The House version may go too far but the what’s currently in place does not go far enough. There may be some room for compromise, which we hope we can do.”
UPDATE 3
In line with the House Republican party line, Rep. Dave Winters, R-Shirland, disagrees with the House Democrats’ plan. He said rule-writing needs to be done by people with the expertise in that bill, such as those at the state agencies.
“I think the administrative rules should be written by the agencies that are to administer them,” Winters said, “not by a bunch of legislators who are not bureaucrats.”
February 18th, 2008
As Gov. Blagojevich prepares to announce his budget plan on Wednesday, business groups are convinced he will propose a tax on carbon emissions to generate more dollars for state coffers. The State Journal-Register reports:
The (Illinois) chamber fears that Blagojevich will ask lawmakers to approve a tax on carbon emissions from power plants and other industries. While acknowledging it has no details about what Blagojevich plans to propose, the chamber thinks a “carbon tax” could be imposed to generate more than $2.6 billion for cash-strapped state government.
“We are planning as though this will be a major initiative,” Todd Maisch, vice president of the chamber, said Friday. “His (financial) needs are substantial.”
Blagojevich aides refused to confirm — but also did not flatly deny — the plan.
Since taking office in 2003, Blagojevich has looked to Illinois businesses as a source for the revenue he needs to support expanded state spending. That approach topped out last year when he proposed a multi-billion-dollar gross receipts tax on Illinois businesses to cover the cost of a universal health care plan and other spending priorities.
In the SJ-R story, the Illinois Chamber notes that the suspected plan for a carbon tax would be just the latest incarnation of Blagojevich’s desire to more heavily tax businesses:
Maisch said a carbon tax would have the same effect as the ill-fated tax on businesses’ gross receipts that was proposed by Blagojevich last year.
It’s difficult to imagine big-spending Blagojevich going a year without a big-spending initiative. Yet, before state officials consider one dime of new spending, they first must deal with a revenue hole in the existing budget. Crain’s Chicago Business has more.
In other words, the pressure is on Blagojevich, et al., to raise more money — and fast. Hold on to your wallets.
