$100,000 for Va. Tech Shooting Victims?
March 25th, 2008 at 04:04pm Andrea Zimmermann
Virginia has offered to give $100,000 to each of the families of the 32 people killed during the April 16 Virginia Tech shooting spree last year and similar compensation to those who were injured.
However, that proposal, which includes a confidentiality clause, is not sitting well with everyone.
The money would come from taxpayers’ wallets, according to the Washington Post.
Under the proposed offer, the state would not admit liability but would justify the payments as a way to avoid a series of lawsuits. The offer came after several weeks of closed-door talks between attorneys for the state and attorneys for families of the victims. […]
As part of the deal, the state would create a fund to help pay for the medical expenses of some of the more than two dozen students and faculty members injured in the shooting, state officials familiar with the offer said. The families of the 32 victims killed by the shooter would get about $100,000 each. The money would come from taxpayers.
Money is only one facet of the settlement, which the Virginian-Pilot detailed here.
Those who survived the shootings say $100,000, which is the maximum the state can pay in damages, would not begin to cover their long-term health costs.
Roger O’Dell of Roanoke, whose son, Derek, was wounded, said families were asked not to discuss the settlement negotiations. He added that his son has made no decision - he doesn’t want to become adversarial toward the school that he loves, but he has been told his lifetime counseling costs could range from $125,000 to $500,000, plus higher health-insurance costs because of his pre-existing conditions.
Post-traumatic stress disorder “could flare up at any time and could be disabling without regular treatment,” Roger O’Dell said. “He’ll have constant reminders because he’ll have the bullet holes.”
In the fall, the victims received money from the Hokie Memorial Fund, in which people donated close to $8.5 million to go toward the families, the injured and the school.
In the wake of the Feb. 14 shootings at NIU and other campus shootings recent years, it is likely that we will see more of these sort of lawsuits surface.
Is $100,000 enough for a life cut short or a life to be forever hampered with long-term health issues? Should there be, or can there be, a uniform policy for this sort of thing, as one commenter asked on a New York Times’ blog?
Entry Filed under: Northern Illinois University



1 Comment Add your own
1. Bookworm | March 25th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
It’s obviously too soon to tell what sort of legal action may ensure from the NIU tragedy, but here are a few thoughts that spring to mind:
1. The VT gunman was a current, continuing student at the time of the shootings. The NIU shooter had already graduated and had no current connection to the campus. Therefore, NIU had no reason to anticipate his prescence on campus that day. He did not communicate his intentions to anyone.
2. Several students and faculty had felt threatened by Cho’s disturbing behavior and attempted to raise flags about it long before the incident. Kazmierczak may have showed some indication of psychological issues but not anything threatening to others while he was at NIU. So NIU could not have known of his intentions in the way that VT could have, arguably, known or at least suspected Cho to be a danger.
3. VT did drop the ball when it came to notifying students of the first shooting at the dormitory. They failed to get the word out about it until nearly 2 hours later — just in time for the second and more deadly shooting spree to begin. NIU, on the other hand, seems to have been very much on the ball and done everything humanly possible to warn students and apprehend the gunman (campus police were at Cole Hall in less than a minute if I remember correctly). Obviously they had learned from the VT incident and they seemed to be following what could be called best practices with regard to campus security.
For these reasons I would anticipate that NIU will not be held to the same degree of liability for the shootings that VT has in its case. There are already some news stories indicating that is the case and no families/survivors are moving to sue.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed