In Chambers
The judge will see you now. Step into Springfield Bureau Chief Aaron Chambers’ chambers for an insider’s view on Illinois politics and government. No, Chambers isn’t a real judge. At least not in the sense of wearing a robe, wielding a gavel and issuing orders. But like a good judge, Chambers tells it like it is.

Archive for July 17th, 2008

Sacia, Other Republicans, Cry Race, Updated X 1

2 comments July 17th, 2008

As we reported in today’s Register Star, Rep. Jim Sacia and other white Republicans on Wednesday accused a black Chicago Democrat of race-baiting during a committee hearing.

During a morning hearing on a bill to help ex-convicts get jobs and start businesses, Rep. Monique Davis, D-Chicago, said lawmakers representing state prisons are more interested in keeping their prisons packed with inmates “from Chicago” than they are with helping ex-convicts improve their lives after prison.

“African-Americans down here (in Springfield) have got to fight harder … to stop this continued recidivism because opportunities are denied,” Davis said. “You need to take the names of people with prisons in their districts and watch how they vote. They don’t want to stop crime. It stops their livelihood.”

Sacia, who is white, told Davis her statement was “asinine,” and she responded that she was not speaking to him. Sacia then voted against the bill and abruptly departed from the hearing.

“Her comments were definitely racial,” he said after the hearing. “They were directed at white Republicans. It was totally unacceptable.”

Davis accused lawmakers representing prisons of stymieing efforts to improve the lives of ex-cons.

“Illinois must recognize there are some people in the Illinois General Assembly who have prisons in their district and their whole objective is to keep them filled,” she said during committee. “Anything that would create an atmosphere to get those prisons with fewer people, or (would) threaten to close (them), it’s a war.”

“’We’ve got to have those prisoners,’” she continued, characterizing what she perceives as the view of lawmakers whose districts include prisons. “’They’ve got to come down here from Chicago and we’ve got to keep them filled because that’s how we get work. That’s our economy. We no longer plant corn. We no longer have farms. We don’t raise cows and pigs. We keep prisoners.’”

Davis, an African American, noted after the hearing that she had not specified the race of inmates packing prisons.

“I didn’t say what color they are, but we all know what color they are,” she said.

According to a 2005 report (the latest available) from the Illinois Department of Corrections, 60 percent of the adult prisoners in Illinois are black, while 28 percent are white and 11 percent are Hispanic.

Her remarks and the ensuing response from livid Republicans has attracted quite a bit of attention.

What do you make of this? Did the Republicans over-react?

UPDATE 1

Sacia used his weekly column, which he distributes to local newspapers, to address the controversy …

We returned to Springfield on Tuesday, July 16 at the beckoning of Speaker Madigan to resume work on a capital (jobs) bill and to vote on override motions dealing with the Governor’s $1.4 billion in cuts to the Fiscal Year 2009 state budget.

The Governor used a broad ax to cut funding from numerous social services and state government agencies that provide very necessary monies to keep the machinery of the state moving forward. The House voted on thirty-three separate override motions dealing with cuts to the new budget (House Bill 5701). My good friend Representative Jack Franks (D-Woodstock) articulated the “insanity” of voting no, in effect voting to sustain the Governor’s cuts. As an example, he noted that the Governor cut a mere 3% from his own budget while slashing more than 25% from Attorney General Lisa Madigan’s budget. No one has missed the ongoing battle between these constitutional officers. This and the other disproportionate cuts made throughout the budget left me with no option but to vote to override the Governor’s actions.

Adding insult to injury, the $59 billion budget the Governor axed had been sent to him $2.4 billion out of balance. There is a lot of  blame to go around in this unfortunate situation, but the true absurdity lies in knowing that no matter what we do our efforts will be futile if the Senate doesn’t return to Springfield as well to deal with the Governor’s budget cuts. Senate President Emil Jones (D-Chicago) is a close ally of Governor Blagojevich and has made it clear that he has no intention of calling the Senate back into session. Sounds absurd? You’re right, it is.
On the budget, the Illinois House did its due diligence and now we await the next move by the Governor or the Senate. We did not however, act this week on a sorely needed capital (jobs) bill that would put up to 700,000 Illinoisans back to work.

Oh, and did I mention that if the Senate fails to return and take action, legislators and the Governor will receive a 3.8% pay raise? This raise will be funded on the backs of hard working Illinoisans. That infuriates me, and of course I will give my pay increase to charity.

I would be remiss if I also didn’t mention the potential racial issue that arose at our Prison Reform Committee hearing on July 16th. I am the Minority Spokesman on this committee and I take that responsibility very seriously. My good friend and an outstanding young legislator LaShawn Ford (D-Chicago), an African American, presented House Bill 2746 that would allow the state to provide low-interest loans to paroled prisoners to help them start their own businesses.

In my questioning, I was attempting to determine if we would be offering more perks to ex-offenders than to law-abiding citizens who have not been to prison. Representative Monique Davis (D-Chicago), an African American who is not a regular member of the committee, said that members who have prisons in their districts do all they can to keep the prisons full. She urged African American legislators to work together to put a stop to it. I told the lady her comments were asinine and it went down hill from there. When the full House came to order I asked the Speaker to investigate the incident, which I felt was highly racial, and at a minimum, race-baiting. [Emphasis added]

Gone For Now, But Maybe Not for Long

2 comments July 17th, 2008

State lawmakers are back home today and are not scheduled to return to Springfield until after the Nov. 4 general election.

Dog in Pajamas, complements of spoilurpets.com

It’s just me, a couple dozen other reporters, some legislative staff, secretaries and a bunch of security guards remaining at the Capitol. Once again, I can show up to work in my pajamas.

But my bliss in puffy slippers may not last long. With Gov. Rod “Madman” Blagojevich, House Speaker Michael “King of the Mountain” Madigan and Senate President Emil “I’m Powerful Too” Jones running the state government, it’s a safe bet we won’t have to wait long for the next drama in Springfield.

Just when you think you’ve seen it all with these characters, it gets even goofier. Yesterday, Blagojevich declared that he might send state troopers or even the National Guard into the neighborhoods of Chicago to help stem “out of control” violence. Only, Blagojevich hadn’t bothered to mention this to Chicago Mayor Richard Daley before mentioning it to rolling television cameras. As CapFax Blog noted, Blagojevich apparently just “blurted” it out.

By the time the House completed work Wednesday, its members had restored to the state budget more than $400 million in spending Blagojevich had cut. Only, Blagojevich said he cut that spending because there was inadequate revenue in the budget to support it, and the House didn’t bother voting for any additional revenue-raising plan to back up the additional spending.

Blagojevich’s people were quick to say the House had acted irresponsibly. Then again, Blagojevich cut just $1.4 billion from the budget after insisting it had a $2.1 billion hole. How did the governor plan to manage that other $700 million in spending for which he claimed there was no revenue? Who knows.

And in any case, Blagojevich has long lacked any credibility regarding budget numbers. It’s prudent to take everything the man says about the budget with a huge — I mean huge — grain of salt. Even as the state faced the worst general-fund deficit in the nation near the end of his first term, Blagojevich insisted it wasn’t possible for the state to have a deficit.

Oh, and remember how the governor tried to cut state funding for 4-H and other agricultural programs from the budget that ended June 30 because he claimed it had a $750 million hole? The governor agreed to restore funding for those programs when fellow Democrats in the Senate agreed to defeat a plan that would have allowed voters to recall Blagojevich from office. And though Blagojevich’s people had threatened to withhold nearly $400 million in payments for schools during the month of June to help close that budget gap, they released that money too.

How did the governor patch that $750 million hole? Who knows. Did such a hole even exist? Who knows.

If there’s another thing Blagojevich does not do well, it’s sit still with his mouth shut. Though Madigan engineered the defeat of the governor’s $34 billion capital plan by out-foxing him on the last day of spring session, Blagojevich is working feverishly to build public pressure to topple Madigan and push the plan through.

Blagojevich seldom misses an opportunity to promote his plan. Yesterday, when he offered to send troopers or troops into Chicago yesterday, he clumsily painted his capital plan as a means to quell violence in Chicago.

“The mayor can be a great help in this in getting the House Democratic leadership to pass that big capital program,” [Blagojevich] said.

That capital program would funnel millions into communities he says need money to fight crime in a comprehensive way.

It’s safe to assume Blagojevich will continue beating that drum. Perhaps he’ll go so far as to call lawmakers into special session. Who knows.

In the meantime, I’m getting cozy with flannel.

Call Your House a Church, Get a Tax Break

1 comment July 17th, 2008

My Future Garage?

I’m thinking about building an altar in the garage, between the lawn mower and table saw

When George Michael placed a cross on the side of his lakefront mansion, neighbors assumed the decoration was simply a display of the man’s religious faith.

What his neighbors didn’t know is that Michael had decided to convert his $3 million residence into the Armenian Church of Lake Bluff, qualifying him for a nearly $80,000 break on his annual property tax bill.

Now, locals are questioning whether the property is a church at all. Village officials wonder how they’ll be able to make up the lost revenue, and residents worry that their share of the tax burden will grow as a result.

Meanwhile, Lake Bluff officials notified Michael that if he is running a church, he’ll need to pay more than $115,000 in fines for failing to get the village’s permission, setting up a possible court battle.


Search

Latest Posts

Calendar

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Posts by Month


Most Recent Posts

Posts by Category

Syndication