In Chambers
The judge will see you now. Step into Springfield Bureau Chief Aaron Chambers’ chambers for an insider’s view on Illinois politics and government. No, Chambers isn’t a real judge. At least not in the sense of wearing a robe, wielding a gavel and issuing orders. But like a good judge, Chambers tells it like it is.

Posts filed under 'Larry Morrissey'

Out-of-Character Morrissey Spits in Madigan’s Eye, Updated X2

2 comments June 13th, 2008

If Rockford Mayor Larry Morrissey has been anything toward state government leaders — even when they haven’t been Rockford’s friend — it’s diplomatic.

When unpopular Gov. Rod Blagojevich tried to deep-six Morrissey’s chief legislative priority last spring, Morrissey had nary a critical word about Blagojevich. And though Rockford’s own state senator, Republican Dave Syverson, has for the second year in a row failed to advance Morrissey’s objectives in the Senate, Morrissey hasn’t offered much criticism about Syverson, either.

And so I was particularly surprised to see Morrissey join a recent staged event in Rockford dedicated to bashing House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago. From Chuck Sweeny’s column:

Winnebago County Board Chairman Scott Christiansen said Madigan was stifling democracy and demanded, “Mr. Speaker, pass the (word I can’t use) bill.” Mayor Larry Morrissey, not to be outdone by the county, said maybe it’s time for voters to change the state’s rules by having a constitutional convention, something they’ll be asked on the Nov. 4 ballot.

“Who here voted for Mike Madigan?” the mayor shouted. “I’m angry, I’m (word I can’t use) off.”

It’s true that voters in Rockford did not elect Madigan. Voters in Madigan’s district on the southwest side of Chicago elected him to the House. Other Democratic representatives — including Rep. Chuck Jefferson, D-Rockford — elected him speaker of their chamber.

It’s also true that Madigan quashed a recent plan for a new statewide capital construction plan — a plan backed by Gov. Rod Blagojevich and the state’s other three legislative leaders. The plan could have meant more than $100 million in funding for local infrastructure projects.

In a news conference Saturday night, Madigan said he supports a new capital plan. But he said Blagojevich — his fellow Democrat and political adversary — must first modify his governing style.

He also undercut plans to expand gambling and lease the state lottery — two ways in which supporters of the defeated plan hoped to raise money to support it. Madigan prefers an income tax hike.

“It’s the fairest tax. If you make money, you pay the tax. If you don’t, you don’t pay the tax,” he said, adding he was not actually proposing an income tax hike.

But it’s also true that Madigan has arguably sent more state dollars to Rockford than any other legislator — including Jefferson, Syverson and former Rep. Doug Scott, D-Rockford — since Rep. Zeke Giorgi, the city’s last great Springfield mover and shaker, died in 1993.

In 2002, Madigan secured $14.5 million in grants for Rockford, including $3.9 million for MetroCentre improvements, $3 million for water-main extensions and $2.5 million for two additional levels to the Pioneer parking deck. The money was part of $1.6 billion that former Gov. George Ryan and legislative leaders set aside to cement support for Ryan’s Illinois FIRST capital program.

As Sweeny noted in his column, Zeke was a Madigan mentor, and Madigan has always had a certain affection for Rockford. To this day, Madigan has framed photos of Zeke and Zeke’s family in his sparsely decorated Statehouse office. He has a conference room named after Zeke.

Over the last two years, Madigan has consistently gone out of his way to support Rockford initiatives sponsored by Jefferson, who last spring became a member of Madigan’s exclusive leadership team. Morrissey’s office didn’t get its anti-truancy plan — one of the mayor’s chief legislative initiative — to legislators until late April, a little more than a month before the end of spring session. But Madigan’s staff worked with Jefferson to twice maneuver Morrissey’s plan through the House before session ended.

Madigan’s staff also was instrumental in winning approval of Morrissey’s top priority last spring — a change in state law that allowed Rockford to impose an extra 1-percentage-point sales tax six months earlier than law otherwise would have allowed. When Blagojevich vetoed Morrissey’s expedited sales tax plan, Madigan’s staff was again key to winning the Legislature’s override of Blagojevich’s veto.

Madigan helped Morrissey even though Morrissey, running as an independent, ousted Madigan’s ally — Democrat Doug Scott — from the mayor’s office in 2005.

Jefferson is a well-intentioned legislator. And over the last two years, he was worked to assert a higher profile for himself. But without Madigan’s staff, I’m not sure either of these Morrissey initiatives would have advanced, given the considerable obstacles they faced.

Morrissey has said much over the last two years about his desire to hire a lobbyist in Springfield. But Rockford already has a virtual lobbyist: Michael Cassidy, a Madigan staffer who works closely with Jefferson and, by extension, Morrissey and his staff. Cassidy has coached Jefferson on everything from drafting to passing bills. And when Morrissey and his staff have worked to press their agenda, Cassidy coached them too.

Madigan killed the capital plan in the course of his ongoing feud with Blagojevich, whose stature has crumbled under a federal probe of his administration. Call Madigan’s move on the capital plan what you will — irresponsible, petty, vindictive. But it is what it is. Madigan isn’t budging.

Madigan withstood pressure from Blagojevich and every other legislative leader, not to mention members of his own caucus, and he killed the capital program anyway. His determination to undermine Blagojevich trumps other political and practical considerations. Did Morrissey, Christiansen and others at the “bash Madigan” event in Rockford truly think they would muster the pressure necessary to finally break Madigan?

Madigan is famous for his attention to detail. I’d bet it’s safe to say he has already taken notice of Morrissey’s “bash Madigan” remarks. I’m eager to see how much Madigan helps Morrissey now.

UPDATE 1

Rep. Jim Sacia, R-Pecatonica, authors a weekly column that he distributes to local newspapers. Here’s the relevant portion of last week’s column:

What a gutsy lady. Though I often disagree with Representative Julie Hamos (D-Evanston) on issues she brings before the House, she hit the nail on the head last Saturday evening at about 10:30. Ms. Hamos expressed her anger and disgust on the House floor (and on the record) as she chastised Speaker Michael Madigan for refusing to allow our $31 billion capital jobs and infrastructure plan from moving forward. The bill passed out of the Senate with bi-partisan support, but was manipulated in the House and killed with procedural maneuvering by the Speaker’s leadership team.

Ms. Hamos stated for all to hear that Speaker Madigan didn’t want this Governor traveling the state for the next two years cutting ribbons and accepting accolades. What a shame. 700,000 jobs – good jobs repairing and building roads, bridges and schools – lost; at least for now. Northwest Illinois stood to benefit greatly as did every part of our state.

Former U. S. Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert, a Republican, and former Congressman and current Southern Illinois University President Glenn Poshard, a Democrat, had been traveling the state garnering support for a capital jobs bill at the Governor’s request. You could literally feel the excitement building as the bill passed out of the Senate Saturday afternoon. The Governor himself worked very hard for the bill’s passage. Sadly, many of us recognized early on that the Speaker would come up with some maneuver to prevent it from passing the House.

The Speaker’s excuse is that he believes the funding mechanism is not correct. He says there should be some “pain” involved. (Translation: he wants an income tax increase). He also has said that you can’t trust this Governor with that kind of money. Certainly the trust issue is significant. But is it significant enough to prevent the creation of 700,000 new jobs and to punish the 13 million people in this state without even trying to come to consensus? I personally think not and I believe most lawmakers agree with me.

The Governor was on the floor with us Saturday night talking with individual members about the capital bill. From my seat, which is literally in the first row right in front of the podium, I was able to watch what appeared to be a cordial exchange between the Governor and Speaker Madigan. I’m told, however, that it was anything but cordial. The Speaker’s press secretary, Steve Brown, said “The speaker, based on his experience, has determined that meetings with this Governor are not a productive use of his time.” What a shame. Isn’t it time to move this state forward?

UPDATE 2

Blasts from the past …

During Morrissey’s 2005 campaign to unseat Scott, both Blagojevich and Madigan worked to save Scott and defeat Morrissey.

Blagojevich said access for Scott is, in fact, a matter of friendship. He said he’d “like to think” that he’d take phone calls from the Rockford mayor regardless of his or her party affiliation, but that the nature of his “close, personal relationship” to Scott means phone calls get answered on the fly.

“If my brother calls, I get that call directly. When Doug calls, I get that call directly,” Blagojevich said. “A lot of other calls, you tend to get it on a sheet at the end of the day.”

Madigan, who also is chairman of the Illinois Democratic Party, was less diplomatic. He implied the absence of Scott would be Rockford’s loss.

“He’s got a personal relationship with me,” Madigan said. “So when he calls, I take his call. If I get a call from the mayor of Peoria, I may not take it; I may not return it. I don’t even know who he is, the mayor of Peoria.”

Later that year, Morrissey made his Capitol lobbying debut.

As he departed the Capitol Thursday, Morrissey brushed aside a question about whether tension underscored his meetings with Blagojevich and Madigan.

“What we’ve got are two professionals who want to get progress done,” he said. “They understand that the mayor of the city of Rockford, no matter who it is, is the leader of a region of close to 300,000 people. They recognize that. Plus, Speaker Madigan is a Notre Dame guy, so we had that in common.”

Red-Light Cameras Go Down

Add comment May 28th, 2008

Lawmakers have already authorized red-light cameras in Chicago, one of the nation’s hotbeds for the technology. But they drew the line last night at authorizing them in Rockford and other communities around Illinois.Red Light Camera

SPRINGFIELD — Lawmakers on Tuesday rejected Rockford Mayor Larry Morrissey’s plan for red-light cameras at intersections after several senators from both parties and from around Illinois derided what they called a government money grab and “Big Brother” intrusion.

“It’s anti-American,” said Sen. Rickey Hendon, D-Chicago. “It’s against our rights as American citizens to live free. It’s against the Constitution of the United States.”

Just 26 senators supported the plan — four fewer votes than necessary for passage — while 24 opposed it. Sen. John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat who sponsored the plan, said he was weighing whether to ask later this week for another vote.

Eight senators did not vote on the bill, and another voted “present.” The roll call is here.

Sen. Dave Syverson, R-Rockford, and Sen. Brad Burzynski, R-Clare, are longstanding opponents of the plan.

“For people to say that this isn’t about revenue, I think, is being disingenuous,” said Sen. Dave Syverson, R-Rockford. “This is about revenue.”

Sen. Brad Burzynski, a Clare Republican who represents the far east edge of Rockford, added in a statement, “It’s more about issuing citations and bringing in money than public safety.”

Syverson filed an amendment to the bill to make it more difficult for cities such as Rockford to implement red light cameras. Syverson stood on the Senate floor and criticized the plan, then voted for it. Burzynski voted against it.

Sen. John Cullerton, a Chicago Democrat who sponsored the plan, saw fit to mention during debate that Rep. Chuck Jefferson, D-Rockford, had not contacted him regarding the bill. Jefferson did his job in the House by shepherding the bill through his chamber.

But it’s also common for lawmakers with a strong interest in their legislation — this was one of Morrissey’s chief priorities, after all — to reach across the Capitol rotunda and lobby members of the opposite chamber. One wouldn’t expect Syverson and Burzynski to promote the bill in the Senate; they said they were opposed.

School District, City Hall Talking About Truancy

Add comment April 10th, 2008

The Rockford School District is working with Rockford Mayor Larry Morrissey’s administration on a plan to give the administration unfettered “real time” access to the school district’s truancy data.

The school district and city have for months been at loggerheads over the matter, so the fact that they’re now working together appears to represent significant progress toward a resolution.

First, some background from the Register Star:

Under existing law, students caught skipping class in Rockford are referred to an intervention plan run by the School District. The schools refer students to the city only when they’re truant more than four times.

Rockford ordinance prohibits even a single instance of truancy, but city officials can’t issue citations to students when they don’t have their names.

And this:

(City Legal Director Patrick) Hayes said the city doesn’t necessarily want to prosecute every truant. Rather, he said, city officials need the additional information to more effectively craft and execute a citywide anti-truancy policy.

And this:

Morrissey is frustrated by what he views as the School District’s slow pace in sharing information about truants. In the first five months of this school year, the city issued 400 fewer citations than during the same period last year.

But rectifying this discrepancy is no simple affair. The city must navigate a federal privacy law limiting the student information that schools may share and a state law describing protocol for truancy intervention.

The federal privacy law at issue is FERPA. More background here. The basic idea is that the law restricts the information concerning students which a school district may share, even with other government bodies.

In response to inquiries from the city as well as other Illinois officials, the U.S. Department of Education last fall offered its view on how to reconcile conflicts between FERPA and state law and city ordinance. An August letter is here and an October letter is here.

The city wants “real time” access to the school district’s truancy information, as Hayes put it. But as the school district reads FERPA, together with city ordinance and the state law enabling that ordinance, the city is not entitled to all of the school district’s truancy information. Instead, the school district shares the names of truant students only after students are truant more than four times.

So the city wants to change state law in order to make clear that it is entitled to the get all the truancy information it wants — when it wants it. Only, until now, the city and school district weren’t having much in the way of constructive communication concerning the matter.

When I talked to school district general counsel Stephen Katz for a story published in early April (linked above), he said he wasn’t aware of the city discussing its plan with any school district official. The city retorted that it had notified the school district in a resolution it provided in early spring. In crafting that story, I acted as much as a mediator between two adversaries as a reporter.

But this morning, Katz said this in an e-mail:

Assistant City Attorney Giliberti and I have prepared legislation that has been submitted to the US Department of Education for their input.

I asked him whether the proposal was consistent with what Hayes had described to me, which I had reported. He responded:

Not exactly what you reported. You reported that the amendment would address the “law enforcement” so-called exception to FERPA. Not so. It is (an) amendment of the enabling act which allowed municipalities to pass truancy ordinances and would clearly articulate that local ordinances passed under the enabling act’s authority are part of the juvenile justice system’s pre-adjudication framework. If acceptable to Dept. of ED, this would then allow school districts to share “education records” with the ordinance enforcement folks under FERPA’s “juvenile justice system” exception. Much better way to approach it.

It’s not clear when the feds might offer input on the agreed language. If the city wants to change the law this spring, it’s cutting it close. The Legislature’s spring session, which started in January, is scheduled to end May 31.

Senators Put Red Light on Red Light Plan

5 comments March 12th, 2008

As the Register Star reported this morning, Rockford’s two senators aren’t impressed with Rockford’s plan to install red light cameras at intersections around the city …

“For people to say that this isn’t about revenue, I think, is being disingenuous,” said Sen. Dave Syverson, R-Rockford. “This is about revenue.”

Sen. Brad Burzynski, a Clare Republican who represents the far east edge of Rockford, added in a statement, “It’s more about issuing citations and bringing in money than public safety.”

The statement that Burzynski issued jointly with Syverson is here.


Search

Latest Posts

Calendar

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Posts by Month


Most Recent Posts

Posts by Category

Syndication