U.S. Chamber Analysis: House Health Care Bill Would Hurt Employers
September 30th, 2009 at 01:00pm Bob Trojan
“The proposed bill would launch more than a trillion dollars in new spending and create a massive new bureaucracy,” says Randy Johnson, senior vice president of the Chamber’s Labor, Immigration, and Employee Benefits division. “While much has been written about pending legislation in the House of Representatives, we believe that this analysis is one of the few that really digs down into many unexplored issues that will greatly affect the employer community.” Climate
See the full analysis here
Entry Filed under: Productivity, Economy
2 Comments Add your own
1. Juice | September 30th, 2009 at 7:18 pm
If reform saves so much money why does it cost so much? The bill is all about guaranteeing free health care to all that can\’t afford it and it can\’t ever taken away, instead of providing a way to buy some basic health care at a reasonable rate without being free. HUGE DIFFERENCE in morals and why it is so opposed by most of the 85% of us that pay for our own health care and are happy with it, and don\’t want to pay someone elses on top of our own! Enough burden on us already,Dems!
2. GOWADER | October 1st, 2009 at 6:13 am
My 6 week old daughter had heart surgery a few years ago. I got a whopping bill of over 70 thousand dollars. I actually had to pay a big 0 on the bill. I will argue with anyone who says health care costs to much! Go home and drink a 40oz Obama. I will keep my employer funded plan.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed