Manufacturing 2.0
Rock River Valley manufacturing experts discuss the many facets of manufacturing: technology, education, training, events, people and any other aspects of this important segment of our economy. They’ll use this blog to get the word out and solicit feedback on local and global manufacturing. They hope to better engage our employers, employees and our future work force and increase their understanding of manufacturing.

Signs of bipartisanship on the climate-change bill

October 20th, 2009 at 04:00pm Bob Trojan

Could these changes move the Cap and Trade Senate bill along?

The part most likely to bring a few extra Republicans on board concerns nuclear power. The two call for streamlining regulations on new plant construction, and putting more money into research on handling waste. This sop to nuclear power is more likely than anything else to bring on board John McCain, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee and a strong nuclear supporter. Green Democrats are wary of nuclear, but the edge of their worry has been dulled by the even greater worry over climate change. Barbara Boxer, the Democratic head of the environment committee, has admitted that she may not be able to hold the line against nuclear power.

document.write(”);

The second main provision of the Kerry-Graham agreement is renewed offshore drilling for oil and gas. Many conservatives want to mitigate America’s energy-security problems by looking to domestic fossil fuels. This has nothing to do with reducing carbon emissions, but it might help a bill that does contain carbon caps to pass.

The third announcement from Senators Kerry and Graham is that “we should consider a border tax” on goods from countries with lax environmental standards.
See the rest   here

Entry Filed under: Management, Economy

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Chuck Sweeny  |  October 20th, 2009 at 5:46 pm

    All I know is you can’t run a First World nation of 300 million people on a bunch of windmills and mirrors.
    We need to begin building 150 nuclear plants, now.

  • 2. Mr. Funfsinn  |  October 20th, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    Chuck, they can’t run more than 1% of our grid with windmills and mirrors, yet they want to throw gobs of money at it to double it, to just around 2%!! It makes no sense whatsoever and the price will double, whether paid in tax, rate increase, or product cost. Also, there is a substantial human cost when they try putting these windmills near population centers to avoid constructing transmission lines. Also, there is a substantial impact on birds and bats, but particularly bats. That decreases the ability to reduce mosquitoes, so I guess we’ll just have to stay indoors all day. But why won’t they value humans more than their “Earth God” when they want to put a wind farm over anyone?

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Security Code:

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed