<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Manufacturing 2.0</title>
	<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing</link>
	<description>Rock River Valley manufacturing experts discuss the many facets of manufacturing: technology, education, training, events, people and any other aspects of this important segment of our economy.  They’ll use this blog to get the word out and solicit feedback on local and global manufacturing. They hope to better engage our employers, employees and our future work force and increase their understanding of manufacturing.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Business Sours on Health Care as Legislation Veers to Left by Juice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/20/business-sours-on-health-care-as-legislation-veers-to-left/#comment-1280</link>
		<author>Juice</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/20/business-sours-on-health-care-as-legislation-veers-to-left/#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>What a job killing and tax raising bill. Class warfare at it's ugliest. Sen. Landreau given a $100M payoff to vote for it. Discusting. Where do jobs come from? Government they think.  Just drive through Rockford and see all the empty buildings. It is amazing and nothing seems to be done about it. How about a tax-free 2-3 years if a new business provides X number of jobs? A little incentive to relocate to Rockford. Listening to Obama talk about the economy and 60,000 bogus stimulus jobs he "created or saved" shows how clueless he is. Unemployment figures don't lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a job killing and tax raising bill. Class warfare at it&#8217;s ugliest. Sen. Landreau given a $100M payoff to vote for it. Discusting. Where do jobs come from? Government they think.  Just drive through Rockford and see all the empty buildings. It is amazing and nothing seems to be done about it. How about a tax-free 2-3 years if a new business provides X number of jobs? A little incentive to relocate to Rockford. Listening to Obama talk about the economy and 60,000 bogus stimulus jobs he &#8220;created or saved&#8221; shows how clueless he is. Unemployment figures don&#8217;t lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Help Wanted by FrankyG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/20/help-wanted/#comment-1278</link>
		<author>FrankyG</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/20/help-wanted/#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>AWESOME and About TIME!

CNN poll: Blame for economy shifting to Democrats

posted at 10:55 am on November 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey 
Share on Facebook &#124; printer-friendly Ten months to the day after Barack Obama took office and three years since Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress, the American public has begun to get the impression that Democrats are responsible for the economic mess that continues to unfold.  A new CNN poll shows that those blaming Republicans has dropped fifteen points in the last six months, while those blaming Democrats have risen 21 points in the same period (via Yid with Lid):
Nearly two years into the recession, opinion about which political party is responsible for the severe economic downturn is shifting, according to a new national poll.
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday morning indicates that 38 percent of the public blames Republicans for the country’s current economic problems. That’s down 15 points from May, when 53 percent blamed the GOP. According to the poll 27 percent now blame the Democrats for the recession, up 6 points from May. Twenty-seven percent now say both parties are responsible for the economic mess.
“The bad news for the Democrats is that the number of Americans who hold the GOP exclusively responsible for the recession has been steadily falling by about two to three points per month,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. “At that rate, only a handful of voters will blame the economy on the Republicans by the time next year’s midterm elections roll around.”
There may be even more reason to worry in this poll.  Obama has tried to sell the idea that the economy is improving, bolstered by a third-quarter GDP number mainly driven by temporary government incentives — Cash for Clunkers and a homebuyer tax credit.  Tim Geithner told Congress that “by any measure” the economy is improving, despite the one big measure of unemployment rising faster than any time in the last six months.  The poll shows that responders claiming that the economy is getting worse rose three points since August, suggesting that Obama’s credibility is waning:
“Some economic indicators may suggest that the economy has turned the corner – but try telling that to the American people,” adds Holland. The number of Americans who say that the economy is in good shape – a number that grew steadily through the spring and summer – has now stalled, with fewer than one in five expressing a positive view of current conditions. More than eight in 10 say that economic conditions are in poor shape, with 43 percent calling them very poor.
CNN did not include sample data in this partial release from their poll, so the partisan split of the sample cannot be determined. Interestingly, they didn’t produce any subsample data on independents. The big story amongst pollsters is the flight of independents, which makes CNN’s survey or reporting decision a little mysterious.
The evolving polling on this shows the big danger for Democrats as they push big-spending agenda items through Congress.  They could do that as long as they didn’t have to worry about getting blamed for a stalled economy.  The undiminished upward trajectory in unemployment has made that impossible.  Democrats got what they wanted in the $787 billion Porkulus plan after shutting Republicans out of the picture, and they now own the results.
If unemployment continues to rise, and if the administration continues to offer fraudulent numbers from its Porkulus project, Democrats will completely own this recession and the unemployment it causes by the time the midterms arrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWESOME and About TIME!</p>
<p>CNN poll: Blame for economy shifting to Democrats</p>
<p>posted at 10:55 am on November 20, 2009 by Ed Morrissey<br />
Share on Facebook | printer-friendly Ten months to the day after Barack Obama took office and three years since Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress, the American public has begun to get the impression that Democrats are responsible for the economic mess that continues to unfold.  A new CNN poll shows that those blaming Republicans has dropped fifteen points in the last six months, while those blaming Democrats have risen 21 points in the same period (via Yid with Lid):<br />
Nearly two years into the recession, opinion about which political party is responsible for the severe economic downturn is shifting, according to a new national poll.<br />
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Friday morning indicates that 38 percent of the public blames Republicans for the country’s current economic problems. That’s down 15 points from May, when 53 percent blamed the GOP. According to the poll 27 percent now blame the Democrats for the recession, up 6 points from May. Twenty-seven percent now say both parties are responsible for the economic mess.<br />
“The bad news for the Democrats is that the number of Americans who hold the GOP exclusively responsible for the recession has been steadily falling by about two to three points per month,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. “At that rate, only a handful of voters will blame the economy on the Republicans by the time next year’s midterm elections roll around.”<br />
There may be even more reason to worry in this poll.  Obama has tried to sell the idea that the economy is improving, bolstered by a third-quarter GDP number mainly driven by temporary government incentives — Cash for Clunkers and a homebuyer tax credit.  Tim Geithner told Congress that “by any measure” the economy is improving, despite the one big measure of unemployment rising faster than any time in the last six months.  The poll shows that responders claiming that the economy is getting worse rose three points since August, suggesting that Obama’s credibility is waning:<br />
“Some economic indicators may suggest that the economy has turned the corner – but try telling that to the American people,” adds Holland. The number of Americans who say that the economy is in good shape – a number that grew steadily through the spring and summer – has now stalled, with fewer than one in five expressing a positive view of current conditions. More than eight in 10 say that economic conditions are in poor shape, with 43 percent calling them very poor.<br />
CNN did not include sample data in this partial release from their poll, so the partisan split of the sample cannot be determined. Interestingly, they didn’t produce any subsample data on independents. The big story amongst pollsters is the flight of independents, which makes CNN’s survey or reporting decision a little mysterious.<br />
The evolving polling on this shows the big danger for Democrats as they push big-spending agenda items through Congress.  They could do that as long as they didn’t have to worry about getting blamed for a stalled economy.  The undiminished upward trajectory in unemployment has made that impossible.  Democrats got what they wanted in the $787 billion Porkulus plan after shutting Republicans out of the picture, and they now own the results.<br />
If unemployment continues to rise, and if the administration continues to offer fraudulent numbers from its Porkulus project, Democrats will completely own this recession and the unemployment it causes by the time the midterms arrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not-so-wonderful Copenhagen Climate Change Summit by FrankyG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/19/not-so-wonderful-copenhagen-climate-change-summit/#comment-1276</link>
		<author>FrankyG</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/19/not-so-wonderful-copenhagen-climate-change-summit/#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Green....the NEW RED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Green&#8230;.the NEW RED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Get the Government Involved-Not by Monkey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/17/lets-get-the-government-involved-not/#comment-1272</link>
		<author>Monkey</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 04:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/17/lets-get-the-government-involved-not/#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>I actually laughed out loud at your last two sentences.  So, less government in our lives but more government subsidies and tax breaks for manufacturers so they can enhance bonuses to execs at the expense of employees?  Makes perfect sense. 

Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.  Great plan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually laughed out loud at your last two sentences.  So, less government in our lives but more government subsidies and tax breaks for manufacturers so they can enhance bonuses to execs at the expense of employees?  Makes perfect sense. </p>
<p>Privatize the profits and socialize the losses.  Great plan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Let&#8217;s Get the Government Involved-Not by FrankyG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/17/lets-get-the-government-involved-not/#comment-1271</link>
		<author>FrankyG</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/17/lets-get-the-government-involved-not/#comment-1271</guid>
		<description>Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ObamaCare endorsements: What the bribe was by bob trojan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/15/obamacare-endorsements-what-the-bribe-was/#comment-1270</link>
		<author>bob trojan</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/15/obamacare-endorsements-what-the-bribe-was/#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>The issue that I raise is that these policies will cost manufacturing companies extra costs and make them even more uncompetitive.
We have enough burden with government mandated costs and regulations, we don't need more.

Read the part that says..."he'll' get this implemented at all costs".  My point is who is going to pay for them?

If you read all my blogs, you will see that I comment on MANY issues that are directly impacting or promoting manufacturing.

Take a look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue that I raise is that these policies will cost manufacturing companies extra costs and make them even more uncompetitive.<br />
We have enough burden with government mandated costs and regulations, we don&#8217;t need more.</p>
<p>Read the part that says&#8230;&#8221;he&#8217;ll&#8217; get this implemented at all costs&#8221;.  My point is who is going to pay for them?</p>
<p>If you read all my blogs, you will see that I comment on MANY issues that are directly impacting or promoting manufacturing.</p>
<p>Take a look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ObamaCare endorsements: What the bribe was by E,M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/15/obamacare-endorsements-what-the-bribe-was/#comment-1269</link>
		<author>E,M.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/15/obamacare-endorsements-what-the-bribe-was/#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>Bob, if you want a blog in which you can spout off right-wing talking points verbatim, then kindly ask the editorial board.  In a town like this, you shouldn't have a problem.  But you're making this manufacturing blog a joke with your blatant political biases instead of talking rationally about the state of manufacturing.  It's not bringing back a single job lost due to GOP trade policies, it's not enticing new technology to lay down roots here, it's simply putting forth your own political agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, if you want a blog in which you can spout off right-wing talking points verbatim, then kindly ask the editorial board.  In a town like this, you shouldn&#8217;t have a problem.  But you&#8217;re making this manufacturing blog a joke with your blatant political biases instead of talking rationally about the state of manufacturing.  It&#8217;s not bringing back a single job lost due to GOP trade policies, it&#8217;s not enticing new technology to lay down roots here, it&#8217;s simply putting forth your own political agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ObamaCare endorsements: What the bribe was by E,M.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/15/obamacare-endorsements-what-the-bribe-was/#comment-1268</link>
		<author>E,M.</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/15/obamacare-endorsements-what-the-bribe-was/#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>And this relates to the long death of manufacturing in Rockford HOW?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this relates to the long death of manufacturing in Rockford HOW?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nuclear Power is Safe Says UK Energy Secretary by FrankyG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/10/nuclear-power-is-safe-says-uk-energy-secretary/#comment-1265</link>
		<author>FrankyG</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/10/nuclear-power-is-safe-says-uk-energy-secretary/#comment-1265</guid>
		<description>Everywhere but here in the US...Shame...Damn Shame..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everywhere but here in the US&#8230;Shame&#8230;Damn Shame..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chrysler drops three electric vehicles despite having touted them to get billions in government bailout cash by Robyn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/09/chrysler-drops-three-electric-vehicles-despite-having-touted-them-to-get-billions-in-government-bailout-cash/#comment-1264</link>
		<author>Robyn</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/manufacturing/2009/11/09/chrysler-drops-three-electric-vehicles-despite-having-touted-them-to-get-billions-in-government-bailout-cash/#comment-1264</guid>
		<description>I believe the deal was for more fuel efficient vehicles, not necessarily electric. That would include diesel and just more mpg. Also the money was given to them if they could present a viable business plan, which apparently Fiat did, the President and his auto task force seemed quite pleased with their plan. It certainly looks much, much better than anything the previous two entities who owned Chrysler ever come up with. Chrysler was run into the ground by both Daimler Benz and the three headed dog from hell, Cerberus. I think Fiat\'s plan is a very good, however, if we don\'t get jobs back to this country, any good plan is all for naught, as no one will be able to buy a  vehicle, electric or not. By the way, it will do no good to produce massive amounts of electric vehicles if we do not have the infrastructure to support them. I\'ve seen nothing despite the massive need for jobs, from this government to even to begin building the infrastructure needed to support electric vehicles. Contact your Congresscritters and let them know this country needs a jobs and infrastructure project stimulus package immediately..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the deal was for more fuel efficient vehicles, not necessarily electric. That would include diesel and just more mpg. Also the money was given to them if they could present a viable business plan, which apparently Fiat did, the President and his auto task force seemed quite pleased with their plan. It certainly looks much, much better than anything the previous two entities who owned Chrysler ever come up with. Chrysler was run into the ground by both Daimler Benz and the three headed dog from hell, Cerberus. I think Fiat\&#8217;s plan is a very good, however, if we don\&#8217;t get jobs back to this country, any good plan is all for naught, as no one will be able to buy a  vehicle, electric or not. By the way, it will do no good to produce massive amounts of electric vehicles if we do not have the infrastructure to support them. I\&#8217;ve seen nothing despite the massive need for jobs, from this government to even to begin building the infrastructure needed to support electric vehicles. Contact your Congresscritters and let them know this country needs a jobs and infrastructure project stimulus package immediately..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
