Don’t you forget about him…
March 28th, 2008 at 11:47am Will Pfeifer
John Cusack, Anthony Michael Hall and Darren Harris in SIXTEEN CANDLES.
If you went to high school in the 1980s (like me), there’s a good chance you were a fan of the films of John Hughes. SIXTEEN CANDLES, THE BREAKFAST CLUB and FERRIS BUELLER’S DAY OFF — what I like to think of as his High School Trilogy* — are comedies than manage to be serious, teen movies that manage to be grown up and artifacts of the 1980s that manage to look pretty good today.
If you’re wondering what ever happened to Hughes, The Los Angeles Times has your answer: He’s living just down the road in the suburbs north of Chicago, where most of his movies were set. He doesn’t talk to the press, he doesn’t hang out in Hollywood, and aside from coming up with the original premise for DRILLBIT TAYLOR years ago, he doesn’t make movies.
Of course, his movies are still a big influence today, mostly because the people making movies grew up on SIXTEEN CANDLES and other Hughes epics. As producer Judd Apatow says in the LA Times article, “You see Hughes’ influence on all TV comedy, especially the stylized single-camera comedy. His great film characters, starting with Anthony Michael Hall in ‘Sixteen Candles,’ were big inspirations. When we were growing up, we were all like Hall — the goofy skinny kid who thinks he’s cool, even if nobody else does. ‘Superbad’ has that same attitude, that mix of total cockiness and insecurity.”
Since those mid-80s high school glory days, Hughes wrote and/or directed at least one grown-up classic (PLANES, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES), two underrated gems (SHE’S HAVING A BABY and UNCLE BUCK) and a lot of crap (BEETHOVEN’S 4TH, CURLY SUE, MAID IN MANHATTAN and others). He also wrote HOME ALONE, which guaranteed he’d never have to worry about writing or directing anything again. Financially, the guy is set.
But it’s too bad he never returned to that high school setting. I’m as sick of sequels as the next guy, but I’d kill to see a follow-up to THE BREAKFAST CLUB with the same cast, set in the present and stuck in a single room — maybe even that same library. Or a FERRIS BUELLER sequel, with Ferris, Sloan and Cameron as world-weary adults spending the day in Chicago. (In a way, Alexander Payne’s ELECTION is a twisted sequel of FERRIS, with Broderick playing a version of the principal he tormented way back when.)
C’mon, John. It’s time for a reunion.
* No, I’m not counting Hughes’Â 1985 movie WEIRD SCIENCE or 1986 movie PRETTY IN PINK. Sorry.




7 Comments Add your own
1. elDizzle | March 28th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
The big question, did Curly Sue drive him into seclusion?
2. Charlie Rainman | March 28th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Why are the movie guys always geeks? Why can’t they be the jock or the cool kid? Why do you guys revel in your uncoolness? Come out of the dark rooms and throw a basketball in the hoop every now and then, John Hughes.
3. Will Pfeifer | March 28th, 2008 at 1:00 pm
Heck, Curly Sue almost drove me into seclusion!
4. kegler | March 28th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
In regards to you not counting certain movies: Weird Science is a classic in its own right. Even as a complete farce, it should be counted right up there with the others in your “trilogy”. I wanted to be like the Anthony Michael Hall that created a hot chick from his computer. Give me Kelly LeBrock (back then) over that blonde in Sixteen Candles anyday.
Pretty in Pink is a a chick flick that made me dislike Jon Cryer in anything he was ever in until 2 1/2 Men. The best thing about Pretty in Pink was James Spader’s character. He is one of the best ever at playing the pompous a**. Just watch an episode of Boston Legal.
5. Marco Milone | April 1st, 2008 at 4:43 am
I didn’t go to high school in 80’s but I enjoyed watching his film!
6. Will Pfeifer | April 2nd, 2008 at 11:55 am
Spader is great playing a weasel. Check him out in LESS THAN ZERO as “Rip,” the drug dealer. He exudes sleaze!
7. Shrek a Deck A Ding Dong | April 2nd, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Speaking of Movie Geeks…did I really just read a spirited defense/analysis of ‘Weird Science’ and ‘Pretty in Pink?” What’s next, an academic paper on the genius of ‘Dumb and Dumber II?”
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed