Movie Man
When film critic Will Pfeifer isn’t watching movies, he’s reading about movies, talking about movies, thinking about movies or dreaming about movies. Now he shares that unhealthy obsession with you. From Hollywood hits to Japanese obscurities, from Oscar night to the summer season, he’s got movies on the brain — and on this blog.

Archive for February 26th, 2009

In heaven, everything is fine…

2 comments February 26th, 2009

heavenly_creatures.jpg

With Kate Winslet (finally) winning an Oscar, it’s a fitting coincidence that the Onion’s AV Club is featuring HEAVENLY CREATURES this week as the selection in its New Cult Canon.

Released in 1994, it’s the movie that pretty much introduced Winslet to the movie world. Even year, young and unpolished, she’s obviously got some amazing acting chops. She plays Juliet Hulme, a 15-year-old who, in 1954, helped her best friend, Pauline Parker (Melanie Lynskey, also very good) murder Parker’s mom. The film is based on an actual case, and after serving a short sentence, Hulme and Parker were released — on the condition that they never see each other again.

If you go in expecting a dry true-crime story, you’re in for a big (and excellent) surprise. HEAVENLY CREATURES is directed by Peter Jackson, and though it’s not quite as fantasy-oriented as the LORD OF THE RINGS trilogy or his KING KONG remake, it’s not far off. Instead of downplaying the fantasy world Juliet and Hulme concocted, he revels in it, bringing their visions of a magical kingdom, a personal heaven and Mario Lanza to colorful life. Those scenes, contrasted with the dark horror of the actual events (and supported by the strong performances of Winslet and Lynskey) make HEAVENLY CREATURES a truly great film. In fact — and I realize this is heresy to LORD OF THE RINGS FANS — it might be Jackson’s best.

Read the Onion write-up here, then rent the movie. I don’t think you’ll be sorry.

Uh oh.

2 comments February 26th, 2009

watchmen-minutemen-img.jpg

The HOLLYWOOD REPORTER has weighed in on WATCHMEN, and it’s not a pretty sight…

There is something a little lackadaisical here. The set pieces are surprisingly flat and the characters have little resonance. Fight scenes don’t hold a candle to Asian action. Even the digital effects are ho-hum. Armageddon never looked so cheesy.

Well, what about the acting, or the use of an alternate history?

 … the stories are too absurd and acting too uneven to convince anyone. The appearances of a waxworks Nixon, Kissinger and other 1980s personalities will only bring hoots from less charitable audiences.

And here’s the last line…

Looks like we have the first real flop of 2009.

Read the whole thing here.


Search

Latest Posts

Calendar

February 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728  

Posts by Month


Most Recent Posts

Posts by Category

Syndication


Marketplace
Classifieds
Jobs
Cars
Homes
Coupons
Your Town
Rockford
Rockton
Roscoe
South Beloit
Winnebago County