<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banzai!</title>
	<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/</link>
	<description>The Sweeny Report takes you into the murky world of  local, state and national politics. Political Editor Chuck Sweeny will try to de-mystify things for you -- once he figures it out himself, that is.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Leatherneck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-448</link>
		<author>Leatherneck</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>Hey did anybody notice that the invincible Barack just had his arse handed to him in West Virginia and will also likely get spanked in Kentucky and Puerto Rico??  Oh yeah, Barack lost Indiana last week too. If he has the nomination in the bag, then why does he have this string of losses?  Maybe he should quit the race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey did anybody notice that the invincible Barack just had his arse handed to him in West Virginia and will also likely get spanked in Kentucky and Puerto Rico??  Oh yeah, Barack lost Indiana last week too. If he has the nomination in the bag, then why does he have this string of losses?  Maybe he should quit the race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Sweeny</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-411</link>
		<author>Chuck Sweeny</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>I don't know what happened to that posting. It disappeared. I didn't do it. I'm going to ask the on-line editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what happened to that posting. It disappeared. I didn&#8217;t do it. I&#8217;m going to ask the on-line editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin Pierce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-410</link>
		<author>Franklin Pierce</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-410</guid>
		<description>Chuckles,

The only person who has more man love for Obama than you is Chris Matthews. He is the one, remember, who said he had a tingling up his leg after an Obama speech. I think you're getting very close to unseating him, however.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuckles,</p>
<p>The only person who has more man love for Obama than you is Chris Matthews. He is the one, remember, who said he had a tingling up his leg after an Obama speech. I think you&#8217;re getting very close to unseating him, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redrover</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-398</link>
		<author>redrover</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 03:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Hey Mr. Sweeny,

What happened to your original posting where you mentioned your opinion of white liberal racism, among other things?

What you have posted now --Banzai-- is not what I was responding to in comment no. 1.
:
What do you think: was Paul Begala channeling Richard Nixon?

Redrov(e)r

"Eggheads* unite — you have nothing to lose but your yolks."
— Adlai E. Stevenson II, 1952</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mr. Sweeny,</p>
<p>What happened to your original posting where you mentioned your opinion of white liberal racism, among other things?</p>
<p>What you have posted now &#8211;Banzai&#8211; is not what I was responding to in comment no. 1.<br />
:<br />
What do you think: was Paul Begala channeling Richard Nixon?</p>
<p>Redrov(e)r</p>
<p>&#8220;Eggheads* unite — you have nothing to lose but your yolks.&#8221;<br />
— Adlai E. Stevenson II, 1952</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Sweeny</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-396</link>
		<author>Chuck Sweeny</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-396</guid>
		<description>No argument here. According to her, she's the only Democrat who can win the "white vote."
And according to Paul Begala, one of her campaigners, the Democrats can't win "with eggheads and African American."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No argument here. According to her, she&#8217;s the only Democrat who can win the &#8220;white vote.&#8221;<br />
And according to Paul Begala, one of her campaigners, the Democrats can&#8217;t win &#8220;with eggheads and African American.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redrovr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-395</link>
		<author>redrovr</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.e-rockford.com/sweenyreport/2008/05/08/banzai/#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Hillary Clinton is not now and never has been a true liberal.  The same goes for her serially philandering liar of a husband.

Hillary Clinton is a ruthless self-promoter who has used the good name of liberalism to disguise her true identity.

Consider this:

Would a genuine liberal sponsor a flag protection bill?

Star-Spangled Pandering
By Richard Cohen
Washington Post, Thursday, December 15, 2005; Page A33
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/14/AR2005121401887.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton is not now and never has been a true liberal.  The same goes for her serially philandering liar of a husband.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton is a ruthless self-promoter who has used the good name of liberalism to disguise her true identity.</p>
<p>Consider this:</p>
<p>Would a genuine liberal sponsor a flag protection bill?</p>
<p>Star-Spangled Pandering<br />
By Richard Cohen<br />
Washington Post, Thursday, December 15, 2005; Page A33<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/14/AR2005121401887.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/14/AR2005121401887.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
