Anti-American secessionists launched Sarah Palin’s career!!!!!!!!
October 10th, 2008 at 12:39am Chuck Sweeny
Fair’s fair, I say. So, who are some of Sarah “Marge” Palin’s pals in Alaska? Glad you asked. Why, they’re Alaskan secessionists affiliated with the Alaska Independence Party, which husband Todd “First Dude” Palin belonged to from 1994 until 2002. Palin warmly addressed the AIP’s 2008 convention on video and congratulated them for playing an important role in Alaska.
Read in Salon.com the shocking truth about the AIP and founder Joe Vogler, who said he hated the United States of America.
“I’m an Alaskan, not an American. I’ve got no use for America or her damned institutions.” — Joe Vogler
Read how AIP nut jobs helped her get her start in Wasilla politics, and how secessionist stalwarts believe Palin is still a comrade in arms.
Ask Sarah “Marge” Palin: When you say Country First, WHICH COUNTRY, the USA or Alaska?
Entry Filed under: Uncategorized
14 Comments Add your own
1. David Johnson | October 10th, 2008 at 2:12 am
Pat. Is there any evidence that any of them blew up the Capital Building, or police headquarters? Were any of their wives on the FBI’s 10 Most Wanted List for being a terrorist? Is there any evidence to support that left wing nutcase group at Salons allegations. No no no no. Is it possible Barrack Hussain Obama is a part of a sleeper terrorist cell? Yes.
2. ernie paulson | October 10th, 2008 at 7:39 am
Oh boy David, The William Ayers story has been debunked x 100. Obama was NOT and is not a friend but a co-worker on a board. He did allow Ayers to host a fundraiser for him 1 time 18 years ago, when he (Obama) ran for the Illinois State Senate. They are NOT friends or pals. By the way isn’t it great that a Vietnam anti-war activist or crusader is now called a terrorist post 9-11.
Hey lets throw wives in the mix too, right. The board that Ayers worked on is CAC. (Chicago Annenberg Challenge) Walter Annenberg’s wife is a huge donor to John McCain. Anything but the issues please, ANYTHING. McCain who I supported in 2000 has nothing. He is a shell of the man I thought I knew.
3. Effmuh | October 10th, 2008 at 8:15 am
Hey David, um, at first I thought that this was that “applesauce” nutcase who just throws random neural firings up there in the hope that shotgunning the front page with post after post will get someone to listen to him. Unfortunately, that’s not the case. This is Chuck, at least according to the blog page and the byline.
Actually, I found this on the AIP’s website: (www.akip.org)
(Begin Quote)
The Alaskan Independence Party can be summed up in just two words:
ALASKA FIRST!
Until we as Alaskans receive our Ultimate Goal, the AIP will continue to strive to make Alaska a better place to live with less government interference in our everyday lives.
The Alaskan Independence Party’s goal is the vote we were entitled to in 1958, one choice from among the following four alternatives:
1) Remain a Territory.
2) Become a separate and Independent Nation.
3) Accept Commonwealth status.
4) Become a State.
The call for this vote is in furtherance of the dream of the Alaskan Independence Party’s founding father, Joe Vogler, which was for Alaskans to achieve independence under a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences.
(end quote)
Hmmm, actually that appeals to me too. “Minimal Government”?? Awesome. “Less Government Interference in our Daily Lives”?? Sweet!! Um, actually with these people behind her, she’ll appeal to conservatives even more. Thanks Pat! um, er.. Chuck!
Lessee about William Ayers, shall we:
(Quote from GlennBeck.com - http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/14530/)
Why do you announce your campaign at this guy’s house. Now, who is he? Let me give you the history of William Ayers. I gave it to you in a thumbnail. You can find it several places. The most concise comes out of 101 Professors, and this is a book about the worst professors in America, okay? William Ayers is a professor at the University of Illinois Chicago. Wait a minute. A connection to University of Illinois and Barack Obama. Isn’t this where Barack Obama also has taught some classes and used Solwinski, yet another 1960s radical, another anarchist? Yes. William Ayers, he’s the leader of the Weathermen. It was a group of students for a Democratic society. This is in 1969. They went underground to become America’s very first terrorist cult. The Weathermen have been described by Ayers as “An American red army.” Got it? American communist army. I don’t believe we’ve had other armies in this country. American red army. In 1969 the Weather Underground issued a formal declaration of war on America. And by the way, America is spelled A M E R I KKK A. Sound familiar? Is there anybody else in Barack Obama’s life? Is there anybody else in Barack Obama’s life that has described U.S. of KKK A? They attempted to incite white student radicals to engage in terrorist activities that would provoke a race war in America, spelled with three Ks. White radicals would shed their white skin privilege to aid third world peoples in plundering the ill gotten wealth of the United States. Ayers summed up the ideology as, quote, and I quote William Ayers: Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents. End quote.
(end quote)
Why didn’t I have a nice little website to go to in order to find the position that William Ayers has?? Oh yea, because he’s a TERRORIST who BOMBED OUR CAPITOL building. Gee, that’s a pretty stark difference there. They have to hide it and you just won’t find it in the media so there’s no really good quotes.
I wouldn’t kick-off my campaign for dog catcher at Ayers house.. Man, who woud do a thing like that. Maybe one of our presidential candidates who kicked off his senatorial campaign in this guy’s living room.
Yay Freedom, Boo Communism
4. Pat Cunningham | October 10th, 2008 at 9:49 am
David Johnson: Sweeny’s first name is Chuck, not Pat. Don’t insult the man.
And don’t insult the intelligence of Chuck’s readers with your lack of critical thinking, evidenced by this gem: “Is it possible Barrack Hussain Obama is a part of a sleeper terrorist cell? Yes.”
That’s the same kind of crap with which you soiled my blog when you dropped this load the other day: “Oh yeah, I got a kick out of that AP article this weekend that said that there’s no ‘evidence’ that Ayres and Obama are friends! The reality is that there’s no evidence that they aren’t ‘friends’”.
Criminal defense lawyers should take care to make sure you never get on a jury. Your philosophy seems to be “guilty until proven innocent,” which is not the American way.
5. Effmuh | October 11th, 2008 at 8:28 am
Is it possible that Barry O is part of a sleeper terrorist cell?? Naw, probably not. Is it probable that a number of his friends and close associates are? Well, yes actually.
If any of R candidates had spent close working time with Timothy McVeigh, it would be front page news forever. William Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist whose actions match T. Mcveigh’s in everything but body count.
These are the types of people with which Barry O chooses to associate with. He freely chooses to spend time with people of this radical leftist ideology. He shares that ideology in a lot of public statements and records. Clearly, the man is a leftist who should be nowhere near the presidency. It is extremely dangerous to have him there and will probably come close to destroying the country.
It is that important, you know.
I’ll be voting strongly against Barry on election day
6. snuss | October 11th, 2008 at 4:48 pm
I’d like America to be “a better place to live with less government interference in our everyday lives.” as well as “a minimal government, fully responsive to the people, promoting a peaceful and lawful means of resolving differences. “. How can you disagree with THOSE principals?
Back to B.H.O., you may want to check out THIS story:
Chicago Annenberg Challenge Shutdown?
A cover-up in the making?
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTgwZTVmN2QyNzk2MmUxMzA5OTg0ODZlM2Y2OGI0NDM=
7. Effmuh | October 11th, 2008 at 5:14 pm
Yea, so Barry H. Obama is someone with ties to leftists, the media and other are collectively trying to cover it up, and the country is in serious jeopardy.
Great news for a Saturday. I think that I’ll go fishing.. when I get off of work, which I have to do because I pay so much taxes.. which will go up greatly if Barry H. Obama is elected.
Maybe not fishing, maybe a beer.
8. Chuck Sweeny | October 12th, 2008 at 1:53 am
The responders to this blog entry are proving my point about McCain-Palin, and especially Palin:
you can put lipstick on Geroge Wallace, but ….
9. Sparky | October 12th, 2008 at 7:01 am
Hmmm…..
“minimal government, fully responsive to the people”
Sounds good to me, that’s what this country is dying for. Seems Chuck shot himself in the foot using AIP to try to blacken Palin. Who cares that Todd belonged to that group, when Obama has a great many far worse ties.
Why don’t you lefties or your paper tell about the Obama lawsuit? www.obamacrimes.com
10. Chuck Sweeny | October 12th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
Perhaps I need to repeat this quote by Joe Vogler, founder of the Alaskan Independence Party:
“I’m an Alaskan, not an American. I’ve got no use for America or her damned institutions.”
I did not get that from the mainstream media. It’s from the party’s website. Remember, Sarah Palin videoed a warm welcome to the AIP’s convention in Fairbanks this year, saying the party plays an important part in Alaskan life.
it concerns me that todd and sarah may be much closer than you think to this party and its dangerous anti-American philosophy. An independent Alaska on our frontier with Russia?
Hoo boy!
11. SNuss | October 12th, 2008 at 10:05 pm
Maybe I’ll head south, and revive this rebellion.
The Conch Republic is a micronation declared as a tongue-in-cheek protest secession of the city of Key West from the United States on April 23, 1982. It has been maintained as a tourism booster for the city since.
While the protest that sparked its creation, and others which have occurred periodically since then have been described by some as “tongue-in-cheek”, they were motivated by frustrations over genuine concerns. The original protest event was motivated by a U.S. Border Patrol roadblock and checkpoint which greatly inconvenienced residents and was detrimental to tourism in the area.
Although the Conch Republic is not, and never was, a real secessionist movement, many in Key West continue to identify with the concerns that motivated the original protest against what they view as an “unresponsive” central government taking action without considering all of the implications. At least three related protests have taken place subsequent to the original incident.
The Conch Republic celebrates Independence Day every April 23 as part of a week-long festival of activities involving numerous businesses in Key West. The organization - a “Sovereign State of Mind, seeking only to bring more “Humor, Warmth, and Respect” to a world in sore need of all three according to its Secretary General, Peter Anderson - is a key tourism booster for the area.
12. hokumboy | October 13th, 2008 at 9:26 am
Much closer to home and one having the possibility of being a “commuter-citizen” is the Kingdom of Talossa:
http://www.kingdomoftalossa.net/index.cgi?lingo=&page=Home
Yesterday, being “Soverign’s Birthday”, was a legal holiday so I applied for information on citizenship this morning.
Since the enactment of 35 RZ22 - THE UMPTEENTH IMMIGRATION REFORM ACT becoming a citizen of Talossa is “Free and Easy”. No matter what your current politics are, the having a warm, caring nation in reserve isn’t a bad idea.
13. effmuh | October 13th, 2008 at 10:16 am
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/13/the-coming-thugocracy/print/
That’s from Michael Barone in the Washington Times about the coming “LIberal Thugocracy” and the repression of free speech.
OOps, I’ll write the rest in the previous post about rowdy “McCain supporters” - Something about true conservatives (oh, and true patriots) getting all testy like when free speech is suppressed.
“I disagree with what you say but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it” - Stewie Griffin et al.
14. Chuck Sweeny | October 14th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
Who the heck is supressing free speech? Oops, here come the black helicopters? Arrrrrrrrghhhhhh!!!!!!!!r
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed