Some MetroCentre facts to correct “Talk Show Callers From A Parallel Universe”
April 30th, 2009 at 09:40am Chuck Sweeny
Lots of myths on the radio these last few mornings about the MetroCentre, from the usual stable of talk show callers. Unfortunately, the morning drive talk show hosts seldom if ever refute anything their callers say.
Perhaps they just don’t know their Metro Centre history. I do. I worked at City Hall when they built the thing.
First myth: “We voted against the MetroCentre being downtown, they put it there anyway.”
Variation on first myth: “We voted against it and they built it anyway.”
Facts: Rockfordians voted in 1967 against raising their property taxes to build a $10 million (that’s $65.3 million in 2009 dollars) civic centre on the east bank of the Rock River, where the Riverview Ice House is today.
The MetroCentre was built in 1979 and 1980 with about $16 million (or $49 million in 2009 dollars) of HORSE RACING TAX money collected on winnings at Arlington and other racing venues in Illinois. No property taxes were used. The west side downtown site was used because the buildings there had been cleared with federal, urban renewal funds. So, the land became the local matching share of the state-funded project. Plus, the project was designed to revitalize downtown, which lost most of its retail stores when the brilliant administration of Ben Schleicher and all but 3 of the 20 aldermen voted to take out the city’s busy State and Main intersection and replace it with an open-air mall.
Late in the Metro planning process, Mayor Bob McGaw tried a switcheroo, saying the building should be built out by I-90 and East State Street. But construction began downtown as planned. McGaw left office in April 1981.
Metro opened at the end of January 1980.
Myth 2: “Doug Logan knew how to run the MetroCentre. It made money when he was there.”
Fact: NO IT DID NOT! Logan and everyone else knew when they built it that the MetroCentre would not make money. Civic arenas never do. They’re a quality of life addition to a city, like parks, bike paths, symphony orchestras and community festivals such as OTW.
Logan, a New Yorker with an awesome sense of humor, turned criticism of the MetroCentre on its head. Ccritics said the MetroCentre would always be in the red, so Logan had the building sheathed in red metal siding.
Critics also said the building was a white elephant. So, the MetroCentre’s first mascot was — a white elephant.
Until 2008, The MetroCentre had a subsidy of about $900,000 a year, paid from the city’s redevelopment fund. Redirecting the subsidy to pay for the $23 million renovation and buying the Ice Hogs did not bring in sufficient new business to cancel out the need for that $900,000. I originally said in this post that “ending the subsidy was a mistake. But Ted Biondo then pointed out:
“The $900,000 subsidy did not end! It was used to pay the $23M debt for the Metro Center and the hockey team, in addition to $460,000 from the county. The subsidy currently stands at $1.4M and an additional subsidy of $900,000 would raise the total to almost $2.3M plus additional debts currently owed by the Metro Center. $2.5 to $3.0M is the correct number for the subsidy. It was not ended folks!”
The reason the MetroCentre offered a wide variety of entertainment in Logan’s years — The Rolling Stones, Roy Orbison are just two, interesting examples — was because Doug was trying to determine what Rockford wanted, and what Rockford would support.
Entry Filed under: talk show callers


7 Comments Add your own
1. unmanager | May 2nd, 2009 at 11:42 am
Agreed,Chuck,,,a lotta misinformation out there,however I do believe(correct me if I’m wrong) when the $23mil.bond sale was being pushed through, taxpayers were assured the debt repayment would REPLACE the subsidy. That,and the fact this was behind the scenes,kept quiet until after the election frustrates THIS taxpayer…
2. Monkey | May 4th, 2009 at 7:38 am
It’s not politically correct to say this but let’s be honest about downtown; it’s going nowhere fast. Despite what the River District folks say and what the Mayor says, there’s little reason to go downtown. Beyond a few good restaurants, one or town interesting stores and the Coronado and MC, there’s few reasons to venture that way. And, really, the Justice Center and the new Federal Courthouse aren’t helping the situation.
We need some BOLD steps in this community to shake things up. Put a convention center and hotel on the EAST side where I-90 is and watch it take off. Keep the downtown alive for what it is; the legal and social service and government center of the area. But, to pretend that we can attract people to live down there is folly. The MetroCentre will keep hanging on but 5 years from now we’ll be having the same conversation about how the finances are bad and we need MORE money to subsidize it.
3. the dude abides | May 7th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
“Beyond a few good restaurants, one or town interesting stores and the Coronado and MC, there’s few reasons to venture that way.”
…which is a lot more than I can say for the East side. Who the hell eats at Applebees anyways?
4. ToThinkisDangerous | May 9th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
Who the hell eats at Appletbees. Uh, only a few million people every year, lmao.
5. Monkey | May 11th, 2009 at 8:34 am
Dude,
Put Brio, Kuma’s, Octane, et al., on the East Side and they’d triple their business overnight. It’s about volume and convenience.
I’m no fan of the East State Street strip, either, but in business, as in your home, it’s location, location, location.
6. TBiondo | May 13th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
“Until 2008, The MetroCentre had a subsidy of about $900,000 a year, paid from the city’s redevelopment fund. Ending its subsidy was a mistake.” The $900,000 subsidy did not end! It was used to pay the $23M debt for the Metro Center and the hockey team, in addition to $460,000 from the county. The subsidy currently stands at $1.4M and an additional subsidy of $900,000 would raise the total to almost $2.3M plus additional debts currently owed by the Metro Center. $2.5 to $3.0M is the correct number for the subsidy. It was not ended folks!
Ted
7. Chuck Sweeny | May 13th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Ted, I’ve revised the original post to include your comments, with credit, of course. Thanks for the catch.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed