Obama and Holder overruled in lawsuit to let illegals vote

Obama’s U.S. Department of Justice (Eric Holder & Company) has been trying to stop Florida election officials from purging non-voters and potentially non-U.S. citizens from the state’s voting rolls.

One must hope the Obama administration is not trying to interfere with other states trying to do their jobs – making sure every voter is eligible to vote in the November election.

It has been widely reported that the Obama campaign has already retained thousands of lawyers to challenge legal issues tied to this presidential election.

There will probably be challenges in any state where Obama loses or the election is too close to call causing another potential constitutional crisis, as if this administration needs any more than they have already caused.


The U.S. Department of Justice sued the state to halt the purge, arguing it was going on too close to a federal election.

U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle said Wednesday that there was nothing in federal voting laws that prevent the state from identifying non-U.S. citizens even if it comes less than 90 days before the Aug. 14 election.

Hinkle ruled that federal laws are designed to block states from removing eligible voters close to an election. He said they are not designed to stop states from blocking voters who should have never been allowed to cast ballots in the first place.

The Obama administration has no qualms about bypassing the Constitution, the Congress and the Supreme Court. These people will not be bothered in the least about bypassing the laws governing the presidential election in any state.

I’m even concerned what the administration will attempt in the event Obama loses the election. Will they will go peaceably or cause another Constitutional crisis, which seem to be this president’s and his administration’s forte.

Another worry is, even if Obama goes peaceably, what further damage could he cause while being a lame duck, until the new president is sworn almost three months later. He hasn’t let any laws stop him thus far!

The ends always justifies the means for this type of administration!



  1. John smith

    You conservatives are getting wackier by the second. The law is, under the voting rights act of 1965 that certain states in which the right to vote has been restricted historically because of race, like florida, for example, cannot purge any voter from the rolls less than 90 days before an election. It also requires the department of justice to investigate the matter and enjoins the president to enforce all orders relating to it. If you dont like the law, amend it, but dont talk about a law thats been on the books for 47 years as a recent obama plot to steal the election. Thats nutty beyond belief!

  2. Carol Foster

    No, Ted, you are the one practicing an “end justifies the means,” by suggesting the President is using the Attorney General’s Office to stop the removal of illegal voters from the roles so he can have those votes.
    The line about “even if Obama goes peaceably” also suggests something rather odd for even yourself. Perhaps this is just Faux News being repeated and not being given full credit for a case of full-blown stupid?
    I sure thought you were smarter, but than, I could be wrong and this is your original thought in the matter based exactly what?
    Conservatives seem to be the real ones concerned with who remains able to vote in the next election who are legal they can manage to remove from being able to make their choices known.
    As for someone who needs to go peaceably, well, maybe that person is you!

  3. bejer50

    Show me the statistics (from a nonpartisan source) that illustrates the numbers and percentage of illegals that have been allowed to vote.

    Fixing a problem that does not exist?

  4. Gee, Carol, your Leftist hypocrisy is showing again. I didn’t hear you complaining that Obama cut off Arizona’s access to the INS database, so they can’t investigate suspected illegal aliens that they detain. The Supreme Court DID rule that such investigations are legal.

    As to Florida’s voter fraud problem:

    At the end of the day, the objections to the Florida purge are about Democrats losing a perceived electoral advantage. In order to address its own voting rights objections, the Obama administration could easily prevent the accidental removal of legal voters from Florida’s rolls by permitting the Department of Homeland Security to share its records on non-citizens. If Florida’s non-citizens happened to trend Republican, I suspect Florida would already have the list.

    Read the rest at: http://redalertpolitics.com/2012/06/14/why-floridas-voter-purge-matters/

  5. Hey Ted how’s that portrait of Jefferson Davis workin for ya?

  6. monkey

    Ted, I disagree with most of your viewpoints but you do tend to argue them with intelligence. However, this kind of post is just wacko crap that undermines whatever points you are trying to make. You’re a statistics-based guy, where is your evidence of massive voter fraud? Where are the “thousands” of lawyers that are on standby? What massive “constitutional crises” has the President actually caused?

    And, on another note: you may not like President Obama but I find it somewhat juvenile that you continually refer to him on any first reference as “Obama.” I loathed President G.W. Bush but I still respected him as the President and would always refer to him as “President Bush” in anything I wrote or said. You might ponder that one.

  7. Isn’t “The Messiah” respectful?

  8. JRM_CommonSense

    Someone would not know “respectful” if it bit him in his assets.

  9. Given the location of JRM’s head, he could pull it out a bit, and bite his own “assets”.

  10. JRM_CommonSense

    Where have you been looking to think that you know where my head is. Your fetish about where people place their heads is about as infantile as the boogeyman ideas you spout. Like hearing a 3rd grader trying to act like an adult and sounding like a moron. Maybe some day you will grow up and be able to carry on a halfway decent conversation.

  11. I can only guess as to what you look like, but if it is as ugly and hateful as your attitude, you need to borrow the “Elephant Man’s” hood to go out in public, so you don’t scare children, and frighten the horses. And remember, beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes all the way to the bone.

  12. JRM_CommonSense

    Okay, keep chirping. I wonder how long the little school girl will take to come up with more inane comments that do noting bu show his ignorance.


  14. JRM_CommonSense

    She just never disappoints. Okay, keep chirping. I wonder how long the little school girl will take to come up with more inane comments that do nothing but show his ignorance.

  15. SNuss


  16. Kind of creepy how he stalks you SNuss. Ignore the little chicken.

  17. JRM_CommonSense

    She just never disappoints. Okay, keep chirping. I wonder how long the little school girl will take to come up with more inane comments that do nothing but show his ignorance. And now we have someone patting her on the back. It is oo bad Sam that you could never answered my response to your last lame claim about something I wrote. I guess you just run and hide when someone shows you were wrong. SNuss tends to do the same thing, or else she calls names or references physical ailments that she thinks make him look smart.

    Only took less than 3 hours last time, let’s see how long it takes this time!

  18. snuss


  19. JRM_CommonSense

    Just more gas to mass from the boogeyman headline guy!

  20. snuss


  21. JRM_CommonSense

    Okay, I give up! You have convinced me that you are a bigger moron than I am. I quit!

  22. SNuss

    Don’t go away mad……TROLL!

  23. SNuss

    Just to annoy the creepy, moron troll, on a related subject:

    Arizona: Border Patrol union blasts Homeland Security instructions….
    To ‘run away’ and ‘hide’ from gunmen..

    Border Patrol agents in Arizona are blasting their bosses for telling them, along with all other Department of Homeland Security employees, to run and hide if they encounter an “active shooter.”

    It’s one thing to tell civilian employees to cower under a desk if a gunman starts spraying fire in a confined area, say members of Tucson Local 2544/National Border Patrol Council, but to give armed law enforcement professionals the same advice is downright insulting. The instructions from DHS come in the form of pamphlets and a mandatory computer tutorial.

    “We are now taught in an ‘Active Shooter’ course that if we encounter a shooter in a public place we are to ‘run away’ and ‘hide’” union leader Brandon Judd wrote on the website of 3,300-member union local. “If we are cornered by such a shooter we are to (only as a last resort) become ‘aggressive’ and ‘throw things’ at him or her. We are then advised to ‘call law enforcement’ and wait for their arrival (presumably, while more innocent victims are slaughtered).”[More….]

    This really wasn’t meant for the armed law enforcement officers, you see:

    One DHS employee told FoxNews.com the instruction cards were handed out to employees six weeks ago. At the time, he assumed they were only for civilian employees, not armed law enforcement officers within the department, which oversees the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    “Requiring BP agents to follow the same steps is egregious,” he said.

    Oh wait..

    DHS officials maintain that the Active Shooter course was designed for all employees—civilian and law-enforcement officers– and no one should rush into a situation where they, or others around them, could get hurt.

    Source: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/212833.php

    That sounds reasonable: Armed law enforcement officers should “run and hide”, rather than attempt to stop an gun-toting criminal from slaughtering unarmed civilians.

    I’d like to see where THAT e-mail originated, but it is probably shielded by “executive privilege”.

  24. JRM_CommonSense


    Here is the document you didn’t read before you passed on another inaccurate, boogeyman headline. It took all of 20 seconds to find, and it show thaat you are once again providing us with an excellent example of a mental shart. Well done!

  25. snuss


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *