The Passenger Seat
Whether you ride, drive or fly, transportation issues affect everyone. Especially when fuel prices are so high. Join Thomas V. Bona as he examines the things that make the world move.

New Amtrak funding may not bring back Rockford route any sooner

October 3rd, 2008 at 11:55am Thomas V. Bona

President Bush is expected to sign a bill that nearly doubles Amtrak funding, a victory for rail proponents. It gives money for capital improvements to speed trains up and takes other steps to help the reduce delays.

Of particular importance locally is the $380 million a year over the next five years that would be granted to states to develop intercity rail routes. Illinois has been particularly aggressive in this, adding routes from Chicago to St. Lous, Quincy and Carbondale, and studying routes to Rockford/Dubuque and to the Quad Cities.

The feds would pay for up to 80 percent of a given project, awarding grants “on a competitive basis for projects based on economic performance, expected ridership, and other factors.”

Here’s the catch. The lack of an Illinois capital plan has been the big hold up on restoring service to Rockford, and it would most likely continue to be the hold up. Here’s what Christina Mulka, spokeswoman for U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-IL, said:

It is possible that illinois and the Rockford route could compete for a grant in the State Capitol Matching Grant program before a capital bill is passed. IDOT would be the agency choosing projects to apply to the FRA for funding (then that project would compete with projects from across the country). The problem is with this program and with other competitive federal funding, without a capital bill Illinois looks like a less attractive compared to other states that do have capital funds.

Now, there is some bright side to this. If the state does come around to coughing up its $32 million for the Rockford route, perhaps the feds would agree to throw a bunch more money this way to make it an even better, faster, more popular route. One can dream, no?

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Dan Johnson-Weinberger  |  October 6th, 2008 at 3:39 am

    If the total cost of the project is $32M to get basic service between Rockford and Chicago set up, and there’s a federal match of at least 50%, then presumably the state only needs to come up with $16M to get it started, right? And that doesn’t necessarily have to come from a capital bill. It could come from the operating budget. If we stretch out the work over two years, then that’s 8 million a year. I may be missing something, but I don’t think we need to rely on the state passing a capital bill in order to begin moving forward on establishing Amtrak service (if we can continue the state’s successful streak of winning these grants — we just won some grants in the first pot of money that FRA ever distributed to states last week)

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Security Code:

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Search

Latest Posts

Calendar

October 2008
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Posts by Month


Most Recent Posts

Posts by Category

Syndication