Viewpoints Board
The Community Viewpoints Board advises the Register Star on the Editorial Agenda and on topics of the day. They are conservatives, liberals and independent. Some are retired. Others are doctors, teachers, pastors, social workers and marketing specialists. Several members of the board agreed to blog on rrstar.com. They’ll share their views here on local issues. Their thoughts – as well as the opinions of other board members – also will appear with other opinion content online and in the newspaper in the Opinions section.

The Culture of Poverty - Food for thought

April 8th, 2008 at 12:38pm Kerry Burd

Hello,

 I recently read an article entitled “The Early Catastrophe” by Betty Hart & Tod Risely.  Although the article was written to show the effects of poverty on early childhood (birth - 3 years) language development, toward the end of the article, the authors also examine the psychological effects of poverty on youngsters.  Over two and a half years, the researchers compared the language differences in “professional,” “working class” and “welfare” families.  Besides the predictable differences noted in language development, what startled me was the information reported near the end of the article.

The authors that “the children’s language experience did not differ just in terms of the number and quantity of words heard….”  They go on to report that the average child in a professional family experiences a 6 to 1 ratio of “encouraging” comments to “discouraging” comments per hour.  The average child in a working class family experiences a 2 to 1 ratio of encouraging to discouraging comments per hour.  The average child in a family who lives in poverty hears 11 discouraging comments to 5 encouraging comments per hour - this is a greater than 2 to 1 ratio of discouraging comments to encouraging comments!

Extrapolated over the first 4 years of life, the average child in a professional family would have accumulated 560,000 more instances of encouragement than discouragement.  Compare that to the average child who lives in poverty, who must endure 125,000 more discouraging comments than encouraging comments.  One can begin to understand why, by the time these children who live in poverty enter kindergarten, many of them have deeply ingrained feelings of inadequacy.  It should not come as a surprise to anyone, then, that these children are at increased risk for academic, social, and behavioral difficulties from the first day they set foot in a school.

The effects of our early childhood experiences are far reaching.  Rockford’s problems are not unique.  In fact, you can find problems like the ones Rockford is facing (crime, truancy, unemployment) anywhere, provided there are enough people living in poverty.  Writing tickets for truants and building bigger jails are not going to effect the kind of change that I know our mayor and leaders want - but these problems are so complex, and the solutions even more complicated.  These solutions must begin within the family unit.  But how can we reverse the kind of early damage that this study (http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/spring2003/catastrophe.html) reveals?

Entry Filed under: Uncategorized

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. hokumboy  |  April 13th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    People are living in this city without affordable health care and Swedes wants to build a million dollar vanity museum? Remember that next time you get your bill from the “trust the best” folks. Have they no shame at all?

  • 2. cathy  |  April 17th, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    I agree that only writing tickets will not do the job. But the point of citing truants from the beginning and making referrals to the system is to provide for early intervention and provide an immediate consequence for negative behavior. Experience in the truancy court has shown already that some parents were totally unaware until their kids are ticketed that they have been truant. If parents become more actively engaged in the process, attendance improves. Yes, there are parents that don’t follow through, but that is not the case with all of the parents of truant students. The point of the ticketing is not to ticket; it is to get students into the system with truancy intervention specialists to help with homework, bullying, substance abuse at home, or whatever the situation is. And then there are parents who are totally overwhelmed and need help, and the aim of the program is to provide assistance to them and their child. The truancy problem is not one group’s alone, it is a community problem, and it needs schools, parents, government, police, and the court system to work together toward a solution. That is what the truancy intervention program was designed for, and if implemented properly and as agreed upon, it will make a difference.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Security Code:

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed