Don’t give in on “gifted”
October 23rd, 2008 at 07:00am Barry Wood
I know this is another one of those things that’s bound to change, but I don’t have to like it: the use “gift” as a verb, as in “The company announced it had gifted the land to the community.”
Actually, this usage is a comeback of sorts rather than something new. Bryan A. Garner writes that “gift” has been a verb since the 16th century. But I still don’t like it.
There are two perfectly good alternatives for the above example: “given” and “donated.”
Furthermore, “gifted” is already useful as an adjective, meaning “talented” or “notably superior in intelligence.”
But as long as some people think “gifted” works well as a verb, they’ll keep using it. That’s a given.
Entry Filed under: strict usage

3 Comments Add your own
1. Leonardo duh Vinci | October 24th, 2008 at 4:15 pm
I know it is “niether here nor there”, but gift is the German word for poison.
2. Barry Wood | October 25th, 2008 at 1:56 am
In other words, “Beware Germans bearing gifts.”
3. Leonardo duh Vinci | October 25th, 2008 at 6:15 pm
Touche!
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed